This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Keep up with the ever changing world of IP with SpicyIPs Weekly Review! A quick glance at last week finding the real Burger King saga continues now at the Supreme Court, EDs involvement in the Shankar-Tamilnandan copyright case, right to health and compulsory licensing for rare disease medicine Risdiplam. This and much more in this weeks SpicyIP Weekly Review.
A Los Angeles jury needed less than three hours to clear Disneys Buena Vista unit of copyright infringementso why did it take five years and millions in legal fees to get there? With another no-access verdict in the books, its time for a more efficient approach. Last week, a Los Angeles jury deliberated for just a little longer than Moana ‘s runtime before deciding that Disneys blockbuster animated film didnt infringe animator Buck Woodalls unproduced project, Bucky the Surfer Boy.
By 'Damola Adediji Policy researchers and government studies worldwide have continued to express deep concerns surrounding Big Tech firms and their extensive collection of personal digital data, which affects how markets operate and compete. In a paper I coauthored with Professor Kean Birch of York University, we dove into these policy materials, using Nvivo to explore recurring themes in across various regions.
The Supreme Court has denied BMC Software's petition for writ of certiorari -- formalizing the Fifth Circuit decision that nullified a $1.6 billion judgment against IBM. The appellate court had overturned the district court's breach of contract finding and its subsequent large damages award. This case involves two large companies, each with billions of dollars in annual revenues.
Software is complex, which makes threats to the software supply chain more real every day. 64% of organizations have been impacted by a software supply chain attack and 60% of data breaches are due to unpatched software vulnerabilities. In the U.S. alone, cyber losses totaled $10.3 billion in 2022. All of these stats beg the question, “Do you know what’s in your software?
Originally posted 2007-10-17 13:21:47. Republished by Blog Post PromoterMichael Atkins rounds up “How Courts Have Interpreted the Trademark Dilution Revision Act.” Better him than me, but we all win! The post Dilution, apres le deluge appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION.
The Internet made all areas of the globe accessible with a keystroke. But that doesn’t mean artificial barriers no longer exist. The entertainment industries, in particular, rely heavily on the territorial lines that were once drawn on a map. Movies and TV shows are not typically offered globally, but sold instead based on geographical licenses.
[Continuing with the blogs celebration of its 20 year blogiversary, Im sharing this reflection from Ethan Ackerman.] In the early oughts (zeros?)–right around Y2K, the.com crash and 9/11–the ‘series of tubes’ that was the Internet was, while still a somewhat newish/fad-ish thing for a lot of attorneys and law schools, impacting significant parts of even offline legal life.
[Continuing with the blogs celebration of its 20 year blogiversary, Im sharing this reflection from Ethan Ackerman.] In the early oughts (zeros?)–right around Y2K, the.com crash and 9/11–the ‘series of tubes’ that was the Internet was, while still a somewhat newish/fad-ish thing for a lot of attorneys and law schools, impacting significant parts of even offline legal life.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content