This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
And it’s published under a creative commons license, with the text available on his website here. ” Interestingly, it turns out that our very own Prashant Reddy seems to have been a trigger for the writing of the book! Let’s hope works like this inspire more such key players to come forward with their own perspectives!
Also, article 18(3) of Law 4481/2017 states as follows: Management fees of the collective management organisation shall not exceed the justified and documented costs in managing copyright and relatedrights. Management fees should not exceed, on average, 20% of the gross rights revenue of the collective management organisation.
However, de facto they merely owned proof of ownership without any proprietary value, as all copyright and any relatedrights were retained and not granted upon purchase. For instance, CrypToadz is a prominent CC0 NFT project wherein the artwork related to the NFT is in the public domain.
WIPO is gearing up for the 42nd session of its Standing Committee on Copyright and RelatedRights and the Africa Group at WIPO has submitted a proposal for a Work Program on Limitations and Exceptions (L&Es). This is made worse by the difficulty in accessing funds to purchase licenses for online resources from publishers.
These classifications are then used, among other things, to establish what business licensing is necessary for a given industry. Under the Indonesian regulatory regime, ESPs are subject to various requirements and obligations related to, among other things, the. cross-border transfer of personal data. electronic data deletion.
4iP Council - Licensing Negotiation Groups: what, why, how 4iP will hold an online webinar to discuss the proposed formation of Licensing Negotiation Groups (LNGs) of implementers that would collectively negotiate and license standard essential patents (SEPs). Applications will be open until 24 November 2021 (5:00pm, EST).
EUI - Florence Patent Licensing Academy - 3 to 6 October 2022 - Florence, Italy and online The Florence Patent Licensing Academy is organised by the Florence Competition Programme and the Florence School of Regulation – Communications and Media of the European University Institute. For more information and to register, click here.
While the Irish Copyright and RelatedRights Act includes a similar provision concerning the authorship of computer-generated works, Irish academics have noted this provision may be inconsistent with the EU acquis.
As such, the exemption is reduced to a priority for individual licensing. VGG, an extended collective licensing mechanism, something which is set out as optional under EU law (see below). The new relatedright for press publishers (Sections 87 et seqq. d) Caricature, parody and pastiche.
That call concerned patents, copyright and relatedrights, designs, trade marks and trade secrets. Responses from the earlier call for views have raised the need to improve licensing mechanisms for TDM purposes. This is not the first time the UKIPO has engaged with a public call for views on the topic of AI and IP.
As noted in the current draft of the EU’s AI Act , “[t]ext and data mining techniques may be used extensively in this [training] context for the retrieval and analysis of such content, which may be protected by copyright and relatedrights.” There are many situations in which this is not true. First, there is pirated content.
If adopted in this form, such a provision would significantly strengthen the position of creators and rights holders to prevent or license the use of their works for the purpose of training generative AI models as foreseen in the CDSM Directive.
As far as material damages in the form of an appropriate licence fee are concerned, the BGH confirmed, in a 2018 decision , that the starting point is the fictitious conclusion of a licensing agreement. In the view of the BGH, an infringement of the film producer’s relatedright does not require that a copyright protected part had been used.
The consultation document restates the fundamental right to intellectual property as the fundamental principle of ‘protection of the intellectual creations of individuals in the online space’ but is otherwise silent on IP. because there is no public access regime that applies, or because third parties own intellectual property rights.
In order to carry out this activity, company A signed contracts with certain suppliers from which it acquired all of the copyrights and relatedrights regarding the specific musical repertoire. The advertising messages are played at a higher volume than the music. Emphasis added.).
A third alternative: the relatedrights approach. We followed the approach of distinguishing between creation and dissemination of works, so as to propose transforming the current CGWs provisions into a neighbouring rights provision. The UKIPO has rightly proceeded cautiously on the matter. by Christopher Heath. €
First, an opt-out mechanism is proposed as a way to license (or gain consent for) the use of protected works for AI training (see interesting comments by J.P. The document (see pp. The discussion seems to be focused on a number of remuneration schemes, three of which deserve special attention. Quintais, especially on pp. Geiger and V.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content