Plagiarism Today
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
When that happens, the most common reason given is that the site is “under construction” or “was not meant to be live” This is such a common reason that, back in May 2020, I wrote an article about how your web developer can land you in legal trouble. This includes web developement.
Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
To help with this, many web designers, especially those that are new to it, get help in the form of themes or stock templates that can be obtained from a variety of sites. Many times, designers choose images or text based upon how it looks or reads, not whether they have permission to use it.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TorrentFreak
JANUARY 26, 2024
“We may be able to provide you with information based on crimes classified as an offense under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and specifically related to illegal streaming. .” Yorkshire Police note that a revised request may be considered but even then, reasons exist for not providing the requested information.
azrights
APRIL 22, 2021
Turning ideas into a business and brand involves using the tools of the IP system – trademarks, design rights, copyright, patents, and confidential information or trade secrets. This insight makes it imperative to consider IP strategically when deciding whether an asset your designer is proposing to create for you will be appropriate.
Traverse Legal Blog
MARCH 1, 2023
If you’re in the web development department, you’re gonna have a set of specific issues. If you’re doing application development, another set of issues. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a new set of rules designed to protect the privacy of European citizens.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 27, 2021
July 28, 2021) (finding that using an American company (also a defendant) providing design services and travelling to Illinois to work with engineers constituted plausible acts by defendants “in furtherance” of misappropriation ) and in Inventus Power, Inc. Cleveland), Inc. Buan , U.S. LEXIS 140744 (N.D.
LexBlog IP
JULY 8, 2021
Zazu Designs v. headquartered company and a Japan-based web developer). The public interest at issue is “squatting,” or taking title to a trademark without the intention to use it. Additionally, merely communicating to another individual a vague Intent-to-Use a trademark confers no right to use a trademark. L’ORÉAL, SA , 979 F.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
279 
Let's personalize your content