This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).
Skillz sued its competitor Papaya, alleging falseadvertising under federal and state law. Skillz allegedly markets its games as being uniquely fair and trustworthy with a badge indicating it is Committed to Fair Play and a claim that it will [m]atch [users] with real players of equal skill in its games. Skillz Platform Inc.
” I’ll focus on the falsedesignation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. So by the time the court says “the parties are vying for users in the same ‘market,'” you know that the judge has lost the thread. The post Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Ultimately, AHBP took an exclusive license to sell the product in Argentina, with purchasing and advertising/marketing spend minimums.
14, 2021) Dawgs alleged that Crocs falselymarketed its shoes in violation of the Lanham Act by advertising Croslite, the foam material that Crocs shoes are made from, as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive.” Crocs, Inc. Effervescent, Inc., 2021 WL 4170997, No. 06-cv-00605-PAB-KMT, No. 16-cv-02004-PAB-KMT (D.
17, 2023) Another entry in the “courts treat Lanham Act falseadvertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisions” line. CareDx sued Natera for falseadvertising. Nor did significant sales growth linked to the marketing campaign at issue. Natera, Inc.,
Amazon is an ICS provider: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants “market” and “sell” products to retail consumers “through internet websites.” I did a quick Westlaw search this morning and couldn’t find another case discussing the 230 implications of the “Amazon Choice” designation.
26, 2024) The parties compete in the hand-held gardening tool market. Unsurprisingly, this is a former employee case with many different claims, most of which I will ignore, including design patent claims that fail because no reasonable jury could find the protectable elements confusingly similar in light of the prior art.)
Carrier & Rebecca Tushnet, An Antitrust Framework for FalseAdvertising , 106 Iowa L. 1841 (2021) From the introduction: Federal law presumes that falseadvertising harms competition. Federal law also presumes that falseadvertising is harmless or even helpful to competition. This makes no sense.
TFL’s website allegedly provides a variety “Affiliate Marketing Resources,” and its marketing director’s LinkedIn profile states that his duties include “Run[ning] and monitor[ing] marketing campaigns.” They allegedly “directly run” ad campaigns for their clients, including Beyond Global.
He posted the Cube design and 3D print files on Thingiverse.com, the largest site for 3D print objects. Kitchen Cube also stated on its website that “we designed and manufactured every kitchen measuring device in one easy to use gadget.” Falseadvertising: Only ok against Kitchen Cube. 8-23-cv-01698-MEMF-ADS (C.D.
27, 2021) Ideavillage sued CCB for trademark infringement and falsedesignation of origin related to Ideavillage’s “Copper Fit” line of copper-infused compression garments. Here, the court granted leave to amend to add a falseadvertising claim. Copper Compression Brands LLC, 2021 WL 5013799, No. 4604 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y.
22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
7, 2021) Quidel appealed the grant of summary judgment to Siemens on Quidel’s Lanham Act falseadvertising claims and related state claims. Quidel alleged that Siemens advertised (1) but provided (2). And there was no triable issue on actual injury based on allegedly falseadvertising to the physicians.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. C21-312 TSZ, 2021 WL 3930694 (W.D. NAR “is the nation’s largest trade association for real estate professionals.”
The stamps thus allegedly operate as powerful advertising, allowing Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard. As for the contributory falseadvertising claim, it too was well pled. Defendants then argued that the stamps were mere statements of opinion.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. This was first used by VSL, marketed as VSL#3. De Simone created an eight-strain combination probiotic product known as the De Simone Formulation.
The plaintiffs alleged that the stamps themselves were “a powerful form of advertising because they allow the Brazilian plywood companies to market their products as conforming to an important American safety standard.” pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. Butler was an expert on survey research, market research, sampling, and statistical analysis.
The first pegfilgrastim biosimilar hit the market in November 2018, and would ultimately be followed by five others, including Sandoz’s Ziextenzo in November 2019. These ads were based on an obseivational study Amgen conducted itself, in an effort to remain competitive with the emerging biosimilar market. Sandoz Inc.
7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. The underlying permanent injunction barred defendants from suggesting in promotional materials that their probiotic contained the same formulation as one marketed by De Simone. and many markets globally.” “So
15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its falseadvertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It
23, 2024) The AG sued sellers of “unfinished frames and receivers” — also known as “80% lowers” or “receiver blanks” —designed to evade restrictions on gun sales. Defendants contended that marketing unfinished frames and receivers as “legal” was protected by the First Amendment. Arm or Ally, LLC, 2024 WL 756474, No. It was not.
TaylorMade Golf Company teed off a dispute over golf club design and filed a patent infringement lawsuit on January 31 st, 2024, in the Southern District of California against Costco and Southern California Design Company alleging infringement and falseadvertising relating to five of TaylorMade’s patents related to golf irons.
InSinkErator also provided market research to show that consumers ranked horsepower as one of the top purchasing considerations for garbage disposals, as well as retailer perspective indicating that horsepower was a key differentiating factorLowes and Home Depot organize and advertise them by horsepower.
In re EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP) Marketing, Sales Practices & Antitrust Litig., 17, 2020) A lot of stuff here; I will ignore the non-falseadvertising related aspects of this mostly antitrust case. Sanofi argued that none of its advertisements or promotional materials made any of these assertions.
The Toyota parts sold by Allen Interchange and Toyota bear the same part number, and according to Allen Interchange, are identical in design, function, and quality. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Allen alleged that Toyota’s statements that “[t]he purchase. The court declined to dismiss the counterclaims.
The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). FalseAdvertising. Apple appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Section 230. eBay case from 2008. Apple, Inc. 2022 WL 4021776 (N.D.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, falseadvertising, and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. The Roundtable will cover the travel and lodging expenses for invited authors.
Despite the rhetorical moves to position the lawsuit about the defendants’ design choices, this is actually an easy case. ” This is the latest entry in the confusing jurisprudence about when 230 applies to first-party marketing representations that are rendered untrue by users’ activities. ICS Provider.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark, falseadvertising, and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. The Roundtable will cover the travel and lodging expenses for invited authors.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. The design elements use “a contrasting font color” making the notice legible on the dark background. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. sought to send the case to arbitration. The district court disagreed.
11, 2021) A rare bankruptcy/falseadvertising interaction. Of relevance here, Everlog argued that the falseadvertising damages were nondischargeable in bankruptcy. BTL argued that summary judgment was inappropriate because the district court didn’t consider whether the falseadvertising was “malicious.”
It provides farmers, ranchers, and butchers with marketing education and technical assistance; incubates “Meat Collectives” across the country; and educates consumers about responsible meat production and consumption practices. GMI is a food company which produces and sells cultivated, lab-grown meat from extracted animal cells.
Plaintiff alleges that subscribers “universally understand[ ] that a product designated ‘O’ is an [over-the-counter (“OTC”) ] drug, available over-the-counter and without physician supervision.” Although Alfasigma’s products were historically designated as F, First Databank reclassified them as O.
Lanham Act FalseAdvertising. Enigma claimed it was false for Malwarebytes to call its programs “malicious,” “threats,” and PUPs. Malwarebytes , the court held that such labels were subjective opinions, not verifiably false. In Asurvio v. Bleeping Computer. Blog post on that ruling.
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law.
After remand, the case went back to the Ninth Circuit, which held that anti-threat classifications might be Lanham Act falseadvertising. That putatively means that the court would characterize all threat identifications as “advertising.” Today I’m blogging the district court decision after that remand.
The underlying legal principles are not complicated: content rules in TOSes are negative behavioral restrictions on authors’ conduct, not marketing or contractual promises to readers that such content will never appear on the site. It’s not hard to imagine how a negligent design claim could have been structured here.
11, 2025) This discovery dispute says some interesting things about gray market goods. Allen maintained that the parts it sold bore the same part numbers and were identical in design, function, and quality as Toyota parts that are intended for sale in the U.S. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Allen Interchange LLC, 2025 WL 465815, No.
It claims to focus on “counterfeits” that could harm consumer “health and safety,” but those are both lies designed to make the bill seem narrower and more balanced than it actually is. However, this bill is itself a giant counterfeit. ” I mean, pretty much every physical product meets this definition, right?
The Roundtable is designed to be a forum for the discussion of current trademark and right of publicity scholarship, covering a range of methodologies, topics, and perspectives. We invite submissions from academics working on any aspect of trademark, falseadvertising, marketing, right of publicity, or related areas of the law.
5, 2021) The plaintiff benefits from very generous treatment of its falsedesignation and copyright claims, in the process stripping falsedesignation of anything other than a prohibition on copying/vitiating both Wal-Mart and Dastar. 2021 WL 1253803, No. 20-cv-06957-VKD (N.D. The court agreed!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content