This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
About the Course Designed primarily to cater to the entrepreneurial zeal of engineering and management students, this one and a half-day program provides an invaluable foundation in the principles, practices, and significance of IPR to entrepreneurship and start-up enthusiasts.
It states that the current IP regime poses problems in the context of generic computer programs because of the way the algorithms are designed and trained using large data sets. The document highlights that “AI systems are susceptible to attack such as manipulation of data being used to train the AI…etc.”
We wanted a dataset allowing us to compare laws across countries and over time, and we set out to develop one. We held a series of workshops during which we gradually developed a survey that would cover a wide range of copyright exceptions. General Exception, Including Fairuse. Personal or Private Uses.
Defendant LHB is a former distributor now selling used Tasers that its owner refurbishes in his home workshop. Axon sued for infringement of the Taser word and design marks and for holding Taser-related domain names for ransom. Likely confusion: Obviously, this is a nominative use. But is it a nominative fairuse?
YT agreed not to consider fairuse in content takedowns from a major movie studio—a concession that affected other users. National differences in Europe could be very powerful in who is designated as trusted flagger; potential crossborder effects. That has influence over policies, usually restrictively.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content