43(B)log

AUGUST 26, 2022

24, 2022) This seems like a silly result to me, shifting the burden to comparative advertisers, but it's often much harder to get summary judgment in a trademark case than in comparable cases. PennEngineering claims a PEM family of marks and sued Peninsula for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false advertising, and unfair competition.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 59

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

Every time a court uses Rogers, it’s covertly holding that it would be unconstitutional to apply a broader set of rights; we’re tailoring the test with this in mind. But the test doesn’t say 1A every time; you just use the test. Ramsey: do it w/broad fair use/general rules.

Trademark 69

Trademark False Advertising Fair Use Branding 69

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 28, 2022

The design of its engagement rings is famously called the “Tiffany settings” which is a style of six-prong diamond setting. Costco contended that “Tiffany” is not just a brand name but also a recognised term for ring setting which is not infringement as they have been using it in good faith. Image Source: gettyimage].

Fair Use 52

Fair Use False Advertising Trademark Branding 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 3, 2024

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Dougies for diapers.

False Advertising 49

False Advertising Contracts Branding Branding 49

43(B)log

AUGUST 27, 2024

But that would run up against a strong preference for truthful speech, especially if the alternative seems to be that PNC can control what apps its customers can use. It was ok to use a qualitative analysis of “bad press” that allegedly came about from Plaid’s screens’/CSRs’ criticism of PNC.

Branding 52

Branding Branding Brands False Advertising 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 24, 2024

Can enshrine things like notice & takedown in © law, but that has effects on the ability to assert fair use. Adjudicators need to hear about risks of overenforcement, overclaiming; defenses—he gets emails from sellers of used or grey market goods snared in a robotic search. Should that weigh into the fair use analysis? [No,

Fair Use 45

Fair Use Branding Branding Brands 45

43(B)log

JULY 21, 2023

but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and false advertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. Defendant LHB is a former distributor now selling used Tasers that its owner refurbishes in his home workshop. Likely confusion: Obviously, this is a nominative use.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Social Media 52

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 27, 2023

Challenges Under IP Law Dark patterns are deceptive or manipulative design elements or techniques used in user interfaces to trick users into taking actions they may not want to take. False advertising and misleading representations: Dark patterns often involve misleading representations about products, services, or offers.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Design Designs False Advertising 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

VIP Products, on the other hand, argued that their toy was protected under the doctrine of “fair use” as it was being used in a non-trademark sense, and that it was not likely to cause confusion among consumers. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Branding 52

43(B)log

AUGUST 3, 2023

Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Implications: too much memorization undermines arguments in favor of fair use.

Social Media 40

Social Media Fair Use Advertising Advertising 40

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Court noted that the Patents Act is specifically designed to deal with matters concerning allegations of unreasonable conditions in licence agreements, abuse of one’s status as a patentee, the necessary inquiry into these allegations, and eventually the relief that can be granted. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

Static Controls in 2012, a Lanham Act false advertising case, the Court gave us two more principles for interpreting section 43: a statutory cause of action extends only to plaintiffs whose interests “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked.” But what is TM use? Then, in Lexmark v. of Ala, LV v.

Trademark 59

Trademark Fair Use Registration False Advertising 59

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 20, 2024

The Trademark’s Function Under Branding The most basic of all definitions of a trademark may be termed as a sign of identification and is generally by a word, spelling, logo, slogan, or design, which can use an identifying and differentiating goods or services from one person or entity as opposed to another.

Social Media 102

Social Media Trademark Branding Branding 102

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 25, 2023

These surveys are now designed to suppress that uncertainty and not let it appear in the courtroom b/c we just want numbers. Discussant: Mark Lemley Maybe corpus linguistics can help w/things like descriptiveness and nominative fair use, though skeptical about confusion or fame (b/c you need a standard).

Trademark 72

Trademark Marketing Marketing Advertising 72

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

In this recent case, Epic sought to register this design for "downloadable video game software"—the Loot Llama in Fortnite, which serves as a resource cache for players. failure to function can be significant in ordinary cases with uncontroversial subject matter.

IP 94

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 94

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 8, 2023

Malwarebytes, which allowed a false advertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v. Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v.

False Advertising 75

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 75