This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Diplomatic Conference to Conclude and Adopt a Design Law Treaty – Plenary Sessions. Having freelanced as a patent research analyst, he developed an interest in patentprosecution and in exploring the Patents Act through various interpretative approaches. Kartikeya is a second-year law student in the LL.B.
Discussing the background of the case in this guest post, Suriya Balakanthan, highlights how these procedural lapses took place and highlights the impact that this case can have on the patentprosecution setup. Suriya is a Patent Analyst from Salem Tamil Nadu. The views expressed at those of the author’s alone.
On March 8, 2023, China deposited an instrument for accession to the Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (also known as the “ Apostille Convention ”). In some contracting parties, an e-Apostille is also available, which should further expedite matters.
On February 05, 2022, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) announced that China had joined the Hague International Design System (the Hague System) that allows registering up to 100 designs in 94 countries through one international application. [1] Kara also supports the prosecution of Chinese design applications.
Filing the Application: File the patent application with the relevant patent office(s). Ensure that all required documentation is complete and submitted within the deadlines to avoid any delays or rejections. Managing the PatentProsecution Process After filing the patent application, the prosecution process begins.
Students interested in trying out for Osgoode’s PADC team must submit answers to our patent drafting skills exercise by 3 pm on Friday, September 23, 2022. Please send your answers in a Word document with your name in the file name to iposgoode@osgoode.yorku.ca. Please note that only 2L and 3L students may participate.
Students interested in trying out for Osgoode’s PADC team must submit answers to our patent drafting skills exercise in a Word document with your name in the file name to iposgoode@osgoode.yorku.ca. Students on the team will also practice mooting with and receive direct feedback from various B&P associates and partners.
As a result, owners of Russian patents from the affected countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the European Union, should not expect to be able to enforce their patent rights in Russia in the near term. underlining added).
In this post, developed along the lines of a literature review cum blogpost, Yashna Walia has looked through the various government policy documents on AI to see what they have to say about IP! The document highlights that “AI systems are susceptible to attack such as manipulation of data being used to train the AI…etc.” Arul Scaria).
Students interested in trying out for Osgoode’s PADC team must submit answers to our patent drafting skills exercise by 3 pm on Friday, October 22, 2021. Please send your answers in a Word document with your name in the file name to iposgoode@osgoode.yorku.ca. Please note that only 2L and 3L students may participate.
The Controller of Patents where it rebuked the Plaintiff for not filing written submissions in time and thereby delaying the patent application process. She highlights how the decision reiterates the importance of adhering to procedural tenets during patentprosecutions. Kalyan Mal & Ors. and Ram Niranjan Kajaria v.
As a result, owners of Russian patents from the affected countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the European Union, should not expect to be able to enforce their patent rights in Russia in the near term. ” (underlining added).
by Dennis Crouch The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently proposed a new fee structure for fiscal year 2025 , which includes significant increases in various patent fees. The NPRM would also hike designpatent filing and issuance fees. The NPRM would also hike designpatent filing and issuance fees.
For example, a protective order could have the following tiers: Confidential : Information with this designation could be limited to use only for purposes of the litigation, but sharable with everyone involved in the litigation, including the opposing party’s employees. How do stipulated protective orders safeguard source code ?
What it contains: type of patentdocument – the type of patentdocument can inform stakeholders of whether the patent is a design, utility, or plant patent. patent number – the patent number can be used by stakeholders to identify the specific patentdocument.
The definition of a utility patent is a patent that covers “any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.” [i] i] Utility patents are the most prevalent type of patent. Next in this series, we will provide an overview of designpatents. [1]
The Assistant Controller of Patents criticized a “mechanical, cut-paste” order rejecting a patent grant passed by the office of the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs. In April this year, the Delhi HC in Blackberry Ltd v. It was found that the order was arbitrary and passed without due application of mind.
In recent years, there have been a number of high-profile litigations in the United States involving patents directed to each of the above-referenced components, including patent litigations related to cathodes, 13 anodes, 14 separators, 15 electrolytes, 16 battery cell packaging, 17 and battery module packaging.
in Intellectual Property Law and Management which is being jointly offered by the National Law University Delhi (NLUD), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM – Indian IP Office). and who is keen to explore an academic sabbatical.
Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs on January 31 and Galatea Ltd. Controller of Patents on April 15 [Madras High Court] Madras High Court, in two judgments, Rhodia Operations v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Galatea Ltd. Controller of Patents and Designs Kundan Kumar. Rhodia Operations v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content