This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Here is our recap of last week’s top IP developments including summary of the posts on Delhi High Court’s orders in the Pertuzumab patent dispute, order concerning personalityrights of the Telugu movie star Vishnu Manchu, and Madras High Court’s decision on burden of proof in patent revocation cases.
PART I] PersonalityRights in Spotlight Once More!: India Pride Advisory Order Can a movie carrying the name of a personality be restrained from release citing infringement of personalityrights? PART II] PersonalityRights in Spotlight Once More!: Anything we are missing out on? Nike Innovate C.V
PART I] Synthetic Singers and Voice Theft: BomHC protects Arijit Singh’s PersonalityRights In a first of its kind order in India, the BHC restrains AI platforms from using likeness of famous singer Arijit Singh, finding them to prima facie infringe his personalityrights. Read on below to know more.
Recognizing this omission as a clear error, the Court passed an interim injunction order, restraining Hindustan from using DISPOSAFE during the trial, emphasizing that trademarks require protection to prevent consumer confusion and unfair advantage. Basf Se vs Joint Controller Of Patents And Designs and Ors.
These affected rights encompass personalityrights, representing a distinctive form of intellectual property that transcends mere financial considerations. Personalityrights, being non-inheritable and non-assignable, highlight the personal and non-transferable essence of this form of intellectual property.
Tejas Misra explains why and how these seemingly innocuous posts may infringe on the shooter’s personalityrights. The Court reiterated that celebrities are entitled to protect facets of their personality against unauthorized commercial exploitation by third parties. Les Laboratories Servier Anr. Sefier Life Sciences Pvt.
Delhi High Court Rulings on Celebrity Rights Galore: Examining the Rajat Sharma and Mohan Babu Orders Celebrity (Rights) in the News Again: Rajat Sharma and Mohan Babu approached the court seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of their personality and publicity rights.
In this month’s edition, he looks into topics including the Plant Variety Registry, different tales of/ takes on personalityrights, and multiple leaks of key documents and their contribution in law-making. and Ors. , Body Cupid Pvt Ltd vs Ms Vbro Skincare Pvt & Ors. as the Plaintiff’s mark. 2 lakh on the Defendant.
This case involved Sun Pharmaceuticals allegedly infringing Cipla’s copyright and registeredtrademark. The petitioner contented that Jayalalithaa’s personalityrights and her family’s privacy rights should be protected and that the productions may be incorrect and misleading. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.
The proprietors of the NBC logo allege not only infringement of the registeredtrademark, but surprisingly, also of their registered copyright in the logo. The ‘use’ of the registeredtrademark ‘in the course of trade’ is an essential prerequisite for a case of trademark infringement. & Ors.
Pidilite Industries Limited vs Astral Limited on 13 June, 2024 (Bombay High Court) Image from here The plaintiff alleged infringement of the design of its coex plastic containers by the defendant. It argued that the design of its container was novel and original and was not published in India.
T Series And Another vs M/S Dreamline Reality Movies on 22 February [Punjab and Haryana High Court] The case concerned the adaptation of late Jaswinder Kaurs biography into a cinematographic film and deals with interplay of copyright with personalityrights. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs on January 31 and Galatea Ltd.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content