Remove Derivative Work Remove Litigation Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

“Pearson v Chegg”: Is “Cheating” a Copyright Infringement?

IPilogue

Chegg works by hiring freelance workers to prepare step-by-step processes to answer the questions at the end of each chapter of Pearson textbooks. Nicole Haff , a litigation partner at Romano Law PLLC, states, “ answers to study guides and explanations to study guide questions are not protected as derivative works under the Copyright Act.”

article thumbnail

Copyright and Generative AI: What Can We Learn from Model Terms and Conditions?

Kluwer Copyright Blog

On the first, substantial litigation has already been launched concerning whether the data used to train these models requires payment or opt-in from creatives whose work has been ingested, often without consent. Is it a proper copyright ownership or an assigned license? We hope to return to this theme in future work.

Copyright 135
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions

Velocity of Content

After all, while we are pondering the weighty issue of future ownership, we are not focusing on the fundamental issue of wholesale copying of works to train AI in a wide variety of situations. This, of course, could be an accident based on true intellectual curiosity, but I do not believe it.

article thumbnail

Why Netflix’s “Bridgerton” Lawsuit is Good for Fan Fiction

Copyright Lately

And unlike the vast majority of songwriters and performing artists who have relinquished ownership rights to musical publishers and record labels, Barlow & Bear decided to release “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical” themselves, which means keeping more of the earnings. In the Supreme Court’s opinion in Petrella v.

Music 112
article thumbnail

Web Page Framing Isn’t Trespass to Chattels–Best Carpet Values v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The plaintiffs lost al of the framing cases then, but here we are in 2024, still litigating framing cases. ” Domain names are also intangible, as are the records documenting domain name ownership, yet the court held they were capable of being converted. Why are we revisiting this crusty old topic? ” That’s true.

Copying 98
article thumbnail

AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework – Part I

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The report complements the analysis of laws with a review of practices and contractual arrangements of claiming and attributing authorship and/or ownership by actors in the field of AI music creation. 1] (On the topic of AI outputs and derivative works, see here.). folk-rnn , Melomics ).

Music 72
article thumbnail

Generative AI, Copyright and the AI Act

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Does such an output infringe on a copyrighted work of a third party, especially those works “ingested” during the training stage of the AI system? Under US law, is the output a “ derivative work ” of the “ingested” copyrighted works?

Copyright 138