This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Memes utilize pop culture content, such as movies, television shows, and other various forms of media, often in a parodic way. xxiv] Intellectualpropertylaw recognizes a limited monopoly-esque property right for the creator. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v]
This provokes the question of how we can transplant evidence gleaned from one industry to another (in Barr’s synthesis, to television). More from our authors: Law of Raw Data. IntellectualPropertyLaw in China, 2nd edition. by Jan Bernd Nordemann, Christian Czychowski. € by Christopher Heath. €
Copyright Act grants authors five exclusive rights: “to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords”, “to prepare derivativeworks based on the copyrighted work,” “to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public,” “to perform the copyrighted work publicly,” and “to display the copyrighted work publicly.”
Dorland counterclaimed for copyright infringement, claiming that Larson’s use of Dorland’s letter was a violation of intellectualpropertylaw. Larson also sought a declaration that she owns the copyright to The Kindest and that the letter in the short story does not infringe Dorland’s copyright.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content