Remove Derivative Work Remove Document Remove Fair Use Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

IPSC Breakout Session #2: mostly copyright and then marijuana innovation

43(B)log

Michael Carroll (w/ Peter Jaszi), Fair Use After Google and Warhol Codification is a big deal; clarifies that fair use is a distinct doctrine, whereas well into 20th century courts were using it as noninfringement. Courts weren’t using four factors before that. A: we have to give meaning to the verbiage.

article thumbnail

WIPIP Concurrent Session #5 Copyright & Culture

43(B)log

Wants to document and explain some of the changes publishers have made, in books, films, and dramatic works. Complications: what is being cancelled/updated: “classic” works for children; copyrighted v. public domain. Is publicly cancelling a work abandonment? Would it allow fair use?

article thumbnail

The Good Get: Interviews, The Predicates Of Copyright Ownership, & Divorcing Subjects From Owning Copyright Content

LexBlog IP

is] that works produced for the U.S. Government by its officers and employees should not be subject to copyright” and fall “in the public domain.” ” US Const., . “The basic premise of [S]ection 105.[is] ” H.R. 94-1476 at 58 (1976); see also Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 140 S.