Remove Definition Remove False Advertising Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on social media, including videos on her TikTok account. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

Atari’s Copyright Claim Against State Farm Survives Challenge

Copyright Lately

Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. It looks like Jake from State Farm is definitely going to blow through his deductible, as the insurance giant lost its bid to declare game over on a lawsuit brought by video game publisher Atari Interactive.

Fair Use 102
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

dueling SJ motions lose in energy drink case; jury will decide whether "Super Creatine" is "creatine"

43(B)log

Monster alleged that VPX falsely advertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle. means, because none of the allegedly false statements actually said “source of creatine.”

article thumbnail

To every cow her calf: claim against Organic Valley partially survives based on maternal separation

43(B)log

Considered in context, “growing real food the right way,” “Pasture-Raised with Love,” “the best milk comes from happy cows,” and “[o]ur cows are social and so are we” were unmeasurable opinions. Dictionary definitions of “social” didn’t “provide a usable standard for defining a social cow.

article thumbnail

Rogers v Grimaldi doesn't apply to alcohol, but Peaky Blinders still can't get injunction

43(B)log

The dictionary definitions of the words “Peaky” and “Blinders” were not dispositive. It submitted 14 social media posts “which it contends shows consumers and retailers attributed a particular source to Defendants’ liquor and Plaintiff’s television show.” False advertising/passing off: Same basic problems.

article thumbnail

adult venue's insurer did not successfully exclude ads from ad injury coverage

43(B)log

The policy excluded personal and advertising injury, including “publication, in any manner, of material that violates a person’s right of privacy,” disparagement, use of advertising ideas, and trade dress infringement, if such activities “arise out of or are part of ‘exhibitions and related marketing,’ ” which are broadly defined.

article thumbnail

it is unfair to fail to disclose paid promotion/for influencers not to do due diligence on what they promote

43(B)log

I’ll focus, as usual, on the false advertising bits and ignore the securities law parts. It is widely understood that Kardashian is paid for many of her social media posts, and therefore, it should not come as a surprise to any reasonable consumer that she was paid for the June Post given it included the “#AD” disclaimer.