This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on socialmedia, including videos on her TikTok account. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
Atari’s copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm advances, underscoring the importance of careful clearance in advertising. It looks like Jake from State Farm is definitely going to blow through his deductible, as the insurance giant lost its bid to declare game over on a lawsuit brought by video game publisher Atari Interactive.
Considered in context, “growing real food the right way,” “Pasture-Raised with Love,” “the best milk comes from happy cows,” and “[o]ur cows are social and so are we” were unmeasurable opinions. Dictionary definitions of “social” didn’t “provide a usable standard for defining a social cow.
The dictionary definitions of the words “Peaky” and “Blinders” were not dispositive. It submitted 14 socialmedia posts “which it contends shows consumers and retailers attributed a particular source to Defendants’ liquor and Plaintiff’s television show.” Falseadvertising/passing off: Same basic problems.
Monster alleged that VPX falselyadvertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle. means, because none of the allegedly false statements actually said “source of creatine.”
For example, socialmedia has been widely discussing the impact of micro-plastics on the environment and contemplating methods to reduce its release. A class action could also be initiated by the consumers themselves as a whole, being victims of falseadvertising.
I’ll focus, as usual, on the falseadvertising bits and ignore the securities law parts. It is widely understood that Kardashian is paid for many of her socialmedia posts, and therefore, it should not come as a surprise to any reasonable consumer that she was paid for the June Post given it included the “#AD” disclaimer.
Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid falseadvertising claim. Thus, Universal argued that the alleged misrepresentation was too vague and non-specific to definitely represent that viewers would see De Armas or her segment in the movie. But explicit misstatements aren’t required.
The policy excluded personal and advertising injury, including “publication, in any manner, of material that violates a person’s right of privacy,” disparagement, use of advertising ideas, and trade dress infringement, if such activities “arise out of or are part of ‘exhibitions and related marketing,’ ” which are broadly defined.
As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in falseadvertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.” Also, the fact that he acknowledged that there were other definitions of “sneakerhead” and that the group is heterogeneous wasn’t a “fatal” flaw meriting exclusion as opposed to cross-examination.
With only 52 calories a serving, no sugar added and gluten free, Blue Ice can definitely help you stay fit during quarantine. Anyway, the FTC considers “testimonials” interchangeable with endorsements, meaning “any advertising message. Have a bottle delivered to your door. fitfriendlyvodka #ketofriendly #potatovodka #vodka.”
Variations in different marketing campaigns and channels (socialmedia versus traditional media) did not defeat predominance. If JLI timely decided to raise an arbitration agreement defense, that could also be dealt with by altering the class definition. The court also rejected a bunch of Daubert challenges.
I also don’t think used, grey market, expired/near expired, repackaged goods, mishandled goods are infringing or counterfeit; the problem if any is that they’re falselyadvertised. User names on socialmedia may or may not include trademarks; user bios give more information. McGeveran: that’s definitely Wal-Mart.
So too w/falseadvertising. Assumptions skipped over in TM/falseadvertising analysis.] That’s where disclosure rules need the most attention: definition and relation to what courts are going to do with the registration. Keep up with the culture by considering socialmedia. It’s market definition.
The Court held that “diagnostic” under Section 3(i) should neither be construed narrowly, limited to only in-vivo or definitive diagnosis, nor broadly to include any process “relating to” diagnosis. The central issue here was whether Section 3(i) is restricted to only in vivo tests practices on the human body. d) Other IP Developments 1.
Across-the-board socialmedia and influencer marketing integration are aspects of the present-day artificiality regarding persuasive brand dissemination in faces and identities. Trademarks Scars on SocialMedia It defies law in this modern digital age. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
They don’t use it often but they definitely have it, and more courts are following the Belmora approach of saying 43(a) gives them that authority.] (3) Socialmedia influencers seem reasonably held liable, but what about when the seller is texting friends. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability?
Another way to put it is that aesthetic functionality requires you to have an understanding of the definition of the market in which other clothing makers should be free to compete. This analysis does make some sense, but raises the question of what the how to identify what counts as a “significant” disadvantage.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Then I’ll talk about the 9 th Circuit case Enigma Software v.
This is one of the many AG enforcement actions against socialmedia for [reasons]. In this particular claim, the Indiana AG alleges that TikTok coaxed users to install its app on false pretenses, including deceptive omissions about its ties to China. The lower court dismissed the case. The appeals court revives it.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content