Remove Definition Remove Fair Use Remove False Advertising Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform. The court also found that the alleged use of the Roblox name was not, as a matter of law, nominative fair use.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

WIPIP 2022, session 1 (trademark)

43(B)log

b/c standard for proving abandonment is not consistent through US. Standard of focusing on TM owner’s behavior (discontinuance w/ intent not to resume use) ignores goodwill and claimant’s intended use/behavior in the marketplace. Definition should be broader than sale/transportation of goods in commerce.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

TMSR Session 3: Private Actors…and their Machines

43(B)log

Can enshrine things like notice & takedown in © law, but that has effects on the ability to assert fair use. Adjudicators need to hear about risks of overenforcement, overclaiming; defenses—he gets emails from sellers of used or grey market goods snared in a robotic search. It’s like with CPB. Riddled with errors.

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Static Controls in 2012, a Lanham Act false advertising case, the Court gave us two more principles for interpreting section 43: a statutory cause of action extends only to plaintiffs whose interests “fall within the zone of interests protected by the law invoked.” None of those were branding uses. Then, in Lexmark v.

article thumbnail

disparagement campaign in niche jewelry market could violate Lanham Act

43(B)log

Both sides now claim the other is liable for false advertising, among other claims.” Defendants also allegedly infringed RCI’s trademarks by using photographs of Roberto Coin jewelry and RCI’s logo in Kings Stone’s advertising after RCI terminated the relationship. Instagram ultimately removed the posts.

article thumbnail

Drop-shipper's "in stock" and "trust us over others" claims not shown to be deceptive

43(B)log

Both copyright and false advertising claims (based on Sports Mall’s disparagement of eBay sellers as unreliable) survived a motion to dismiss, but the false advertising claim can’t make it past summary judgment, while Krikor received partial summary judgment on the copyright claim. Nor was the use of the photos fair use.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Court held that “diagnostic” under Section 3(i) should neither be construed narrowly, limited to only in-vivo or definitive diagnosis, nor broadly to include any process “relating to” diagnosis. On March 13, the Delhi High Court granted an ex parte interim injunction in Markets and Markets Research Pvt.

IP 112