Remove Definition Remove Designs Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

antitrust claim against Suboxone, including false advertising, survives summary judgment

43(B)log

22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to false advertising difficult.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. ” This definition of a service is an obvious tautology, and it’s also obviously in tension with the First Amendment. The post Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Even in default, it's not TM infringement to resell legitimate goods (but maybe false advertising to call them new)

43(B)log

The court dismissed most of Quincy’s claims (counterfeiting, trademark infringement, and false designation of origin) except for false advertising—a rare (and conceptually sound) approach that other, non-default cases could benefit from. Even after default.

article thumbnail

Copyright preemption in trade dress claims?

43(B)log

Scotts alleged rights in its red mark, black trade dress, black label, and yellow barrier design that were allegedly infringed by competitor SBM’s competing products. A product name is placed between the pentagon design and the information bars. At least the court is equally lenient with TM and false advertising?

article thumbnail

TM infringement and false advertising claims related to putative open source software "fork" succeed

43(B)log

The parties previously partnered nonexclusively so that PureThink would sell and support the commercial version of Neo4j; upon termination, PureThink expressly agreed to “cease using any trademarks, service marks and other designations of Plaintiffs.” Summary judgment granted on state and federal false advertising claims.

article thumbnail

Two hospitals can both be best, and use purple ads (for now at least)

43(B)log

1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and false advertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the false advertising claims with prejudice.

article thumbnail

gray marketer's counterclaims against Toyota survive, but it still must defend itself

43(B)log

The Toyota parts sold by Allen Interchange and Toyota bear the same part number, and according to Allen Interchange, are identical in design, function, and quality. Lanham Act false advertising: Allen alleged that Toyota’s statements that “[t]he purchase. The court declined to dismiss the counterclaims.