This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Simply calling A S LIVE FOREVER a brand cannot transform an otherwise unregistrable designation into a registrablemark." Text Copyright John L. TTABlogger comment: The Board distinguished the "100% THAT B H" case, where "much of the evidence of third-party use specifically [sought] to associate the goods … with Lizzo."
Intellectual property law includes patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets and is an important consideration for any new business. This article will address trademarks and copyrights, but the law firm of TraskBritt can assist with any intellectual property law needs. Trademarks and copyrights offer different protections.
Yesterday, it was all about key developments in the copyright field in the Africa IP Highlights 2023 – the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga. Today, it’s about the trade marks. Katpost on the decision here.
The Trade Mark [sic] Act is not an act to register words but to register trademarks. Before there can be registrability, there must be a trademark (or a servicemark) and, unless words have been so used, they cannot qualify for registration." Text Copyright John L. In re Standard Oil Co. , Welch 2022.
In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC affirmed the TTAB's decision [ TTABlogged here ], granting a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark CAPTAIN CANNABIS for comic books, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with Petitioner Laverne J. Andrusiek's identical common law mark, also for comic books.
.” The “Claiming User Date” category pertains to trademarks that are already in use by the applicant in the market, while the “Proposed to be Used” category applies to trademarks or servicemarks that are for future use.
Applicant’s incorporation of her organization, application for tax-exempt status and registration of her domain name did not accord her servicemark rights. What is the first use date for the restaurant's services? Text Copyright John L. See Stawski v. 3d 1036, 50 USPQ2d 1545, 1555 (9th Cir. Welch 2021.
trademark and patent registrations will not protect rights holders’ IP in the Philippines. There is no such thing as an “international copyright” that will automatically protect an author’s writings throughout the world. A certificate of registration may be defeated by evidence of prior use of the mark by another person.
In a "somewhat unusual" Section 2(d) cancellation proceeding targeting a Supplemental Register registration and involving "dueling claims of acquired distinctiveness," the Board granted a petition for cancellation of Fieldvine's Inc's registration for the mark PERMITS.COM for construction permit services.
In a less than enlightening decision, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark shown below as a servicemark for "casinos" and "hotel, restaurant and bar services," finding that the mark "is not an inherently distinctive source identifier and therefore, fails to function as a servicemark for Applicants services."
Respondent's rope-a-dope defense proved to be successful in this cancellation proceeding aimed at a registration for the mark ONEPACKET (standard form) for computer-related services. What if the registrant has no intent one way or the other? Then registrant wins. - Text Copyright John L. Emphasis supplied.].
As readers of Velocity of Content know, the US has had a copyright statute on the books since 1790, following closely on the heels of the (then) freshly minted copyright and patent clause in the Constitution. Copyright Office, after what amounts to a much lighter review process. Unlike copyrights and patents, U.S.
become ordained” or “become a minister,” is strong evidence that Applicant’s consumers will perceive “get ordained” not as a servicemark but rather for the commonly understood meaning of the words. Its intent that the phrase function as a servicemark is irrelevant. Would you have applied for registration?
Bertini petitioned to cancel a registration for the mark APPLE for a host of entertainment and other services in class 41, claiming that Apple Inc. abandoned the mark through nonuse. If the petitioner presents a prima facie case, the burden of production shifts to the registrant to rebut the prima facie showing.
1] The Copyright Act protects certain types of works, which are included in Section 13. 13 (1) states that original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works as well as cinematograph films and sound recordings are protected by copyright. regarding the copyright for the film “De Dhakka.”
The Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark shown below for mortgage financing services, finding that Petitioner CBC Mortgage was the first and only user of the mark for those services. Text Copyright John L. 3d 1023, 123 USPQ2d 1024, 1028 (Fed. Welch 2022.
Section 4 of the Trademark Act provides for registration of a collective membership mark, defined as a trademark or servicemark adopted by a collective and used by members to indicate membership in the collective. Text Copyright John L. Emphasis by the Board]. Welch 2023.
On the other hand, the same decided in favor of the applicant, the trademark goes for registration. Registration of Trademark. If the accepted trademark is not opposed during the advertisement for 4 months, then it will proceed for trademark registration. Renewal of Trademark.
Boston Suburban allegedly continued to use the “Logan Car Service” mark in online keyword advertising and in metatags, and continued to copy customer reviews from Boston Carriage’s website and publish them on online review platforms. The actionable alleged misrepresentation is that defendant performed the relevant services.
TTABlog Test: Is HI-FI Confusable With HIGH FIDELITY for Overlapping Marketing Services ? Yes] TTAB Orders Cancellation of CAPTAIN CANNABIS Registration for Comic Books: Petitioner Proved Priority By Use Analogous to Trademark Use TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out? Guess What? Welch 2022.
The Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark MRS. COLORADO , finding that Respondent Abundance Productions had not used the mark in commerce in connection with "Entertainment in the nature of beauty pageants" on or before the filing date of the underlying application. Emphasis supplied].
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or servicemark. A threshold question in evaluating the registrability of a trademark or servicemark is whether the proposed mark meets the source indication requirement.
In this appeal from final refusals issued in two expungement proceedings, the Board affirmed the USPTO Director's decision to cancel registrations for the mark SMARTLOCK , in standard character and design form, for "Components for air conditioning and cooling systems, namely, evaporative air coolers." Text Copyright John L.
The domain registration agreement incorporates the policy. The disputes should deal with the registration of a domain name. It also lays down the use of an Internet domain name between the registrant and any party other than them. Servicemark and trademark holders must be granted civil recourse. INDRP stands for.in
In this opposition to registration of the mark BLIZZARD for various business services, Applicant Ava Labs, Inc., counterclaimed to cancel two pleaded registrations owned by Opposer Blizzard Entertainment for online retail store and mail order services. In re Dr. Pepper Co., 2d 508, 510 (Fed. Carefirst of Md.,
This is clear from the third-party servicemark, trade name and descriptive uses discussed above, and from Applicant’s prior Supplemental Register registration, as well as her disclaimer of “SOLAR” and Section 2(f) claim in her original application. Text Copyright John L. Read comments and post your comment here.
Jones filed counterclaims seeking partial cancellation of those two registrations (the "Counterclaimed Registrations") on the ground of nonuse prior to the expiration of the time for filing the statements of use, for all of the services except for the mentoring portion of the athletic development program. Text Copyright John L.
Here are three recent TTAB rulings, each sustaining an opposition based upon non-use of the opposed servicemark. For a servicemark, the services must be rendered in order to qualify as "use in commerce" as defined in Section 45 of the Lanham Act. Don't try to register a use-less mark? PayNearMe, Inc.
The Board noted that product packaging trade dress and trade dress for services can be inherently distinctive, but here inherent distinctiveness was not at issue because Applicant sought registration under Section 2(f). Consequently, "the proposed mark’s lack of inherent distinctiveness is deemed an established fact."
Regarding the IPR matters, Cambodia has issued the following legal documents: • Law concerning Marks, Trade Name and Acts of Unfair Competition dated January 8, 2002; • Law on Patents, Utility Model Certificates and Industrial Designs, in force since January 2003; • Law on Copyright and Related Right, in force since March 2003.
Sections 1 and 2 provide for registration of "trademark[s] by which goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others." Section 3 states that servicemarks are registrable "in the same manner and with the same effect as trademarks." are not registrable." Text Copyright John L.
You can apply for trademark registration online, the process for which is fairly straightforward. However, as simple as the trademark registration process may seem, picking the right trademark is no easy nut to crack. Hiring a trademark lawyer will help you take care of all your registration needs. Why hire a trademark lawyer?
The second edition offers revised, or wholly rewritten chapters to the overlaps discussed in the first edition so as to reflect recent developments, as well as to include new chapters (the overlap between privacy and copyright law; privacy and secrecy; trademarks certification marks and collective marks; and IP and traditional knowledge).
You can apply for trademark registration online, the process for which is fairly straightforward. However, as simple as the trademark registration process may seem, picking the right trademark is no easy nut to crack. A trademark lawyer or agent can advise on matters related to trademark filings, registration and opposition.
35: TTAB Grants MIRAGE BRANDS Cancellation Petition Due To Likelihood of Reverse Confusion On Remand from the CAFC, TTAB Denies Petition for Cancellation of "NAKED" Registration for Condoms TTABlog Test: Three Recent Section 2(d) Inter Partes Cases - How Did They Come Out? Text Copyright John L. [Yes] Precedential No. Welch 2021.
From patents to copyrights, Trade Marks to trade secrets, the Berne Convention to TRIPS, knowing these accords is critical for individuals, corporations, and policymakers navigating the complexity of ‘intellectual property’ protection in the twenty-first century. ‘The
Banc of California petitioned to cancel a registration for the mark shown below left, on the ground of likely confusion with its registered mark shown below right, both for, inter alia , banking services. Since both parties rely on issued registrations, priority was an issue in this proceeding. Cancellation No.
Applicant argued that the cited mark is weak in view of third-party uses and registrations in the travel field, and so confusion is not likely. Under the sixth DuPont factor, the Board considered whether the strength "may be attenuated by '[t]he number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods [and services].'"
The Board observed that “a proposed trademark is registrable only if it functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services.” Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Trademark Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that fails to function as a servicemark. “[N]ot
However, when the evidence is insufficient to show that a proposed mark has been widely used in connection with the goods at issue, it is improper to refuse registration on the ground of failure-to-function. The critical issue, of course is how the relevant public perceives the proposed mark. Text Copyright John L.
Applicant UNIP (apparently owned in part by LeBron James) counterclaimed for cancellation of that registration on the ground of likelihood of confusion. 91244990 (December 14, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. TM) Text Copyright John L. Game Plan, Inc. Game Plan, Inc. Uninterrupted IP, LLC , Opposition No.
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark WE’RE HERE TO HELP WITH YOUR LEGAL NEEDS! finding that the phrase fails to function as a servicemark for "legal services." Text Copyright John L. In re Richard M. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1052, 1053. Read comments and post your comment here. Welch 2024.
In a whopping 82-page opinion, the Board affirmed the USPTO's refusal to register PARKING.COM , on either the Principal Register or the Supplemental Register, as a servicemark for “website providing information regarding parking availability." Text Copyright John L. The Board was not impressed. Welch 2023.
The Board observed that, as made clear by the Trademark Act, the USPTO "is statutorily constrained to register matter on the Principal Register if and only if it functions as a mark." Applicant Pound argued that the Board has long recognized the registrability of mnemonic telephone numbers, pointing to TMEP Section 1209.02(l).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content