This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Ever since the passage of the EUs Digital Single Marketcopyright directive in 2019, I have been especially intrigued by the rights reservation provisions relating to the commercial text and data mining (TDM) exception in Article 4. An Interview with Haralambos Babis Marmanis This piece originally appeared in The Scholarly Kitchen.
In order to train their technologies, should AI companies be allowed to use works under copyright protection without consent? The lawsuits brought by the owners of such works, including artworks in the case of image-generators and journalism in the NYT case, claim that this should not be allowed. Fair Use Precedent?
law, a copyright owner does not need to include a copyrightnotice on published works, nor does the owner need to post notices barring the use of the work. You should presume works are protected by copyright unless proven otherwise. There's a difference between authorized end-user activity and unauthorized copying.
In the quaint days of 2019, when the EU issued its Digital Single MarketCopyright Directive (DSM) , much attention was focused on issues such as a news publishers’ right and the obligations of platforms to take down infringing materials. Is a copyrightnotice sufficient? What about the words “all rights reserved?”
If the work was published with proper copyrightnotice, it received a federal statutory copyright. If the work was published without proper copyrightnotice, the work entered the public domain. But releasing full sound recordings of interviews for sale is far less transformative than standard journalism.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content