This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
For companies whose movies are downloaded and shared illegally, solutions have been developed that allow them to monitor suspected pirates and track them back to their ISPs, before obtaining their identities and making a settlement offer to end the risk of a full-blown lawsuit.
However, that agreement made it clear that FDN retained all rights to the intellectualproperty involved. As such, they would hold the copyright on those text descriptions. Their pages contained a pair of copyrightnotices that read, “Nothing on this page may be copied or reproduced without explicit permission.”
Webinar on ‘Traditional Knowledge as IntellectualProperty: Opportunities and Challenges at the International Level’ [October 13]. The Walt Disney Company filed numerous lawsuits in courts in New York and California seeking to invalidate copyrightnotices issued by painters and illustrators associated with Marvel characters.
Typically, they are extracting settlements anywhere from $150 to $750 per movie allegedly infringed. For example, if an adult downloads 100 movies and shares them via BitTorrent protocol via “the swarm” the so-called John Doe Defendant can be on the hook for a $20,000 to $50,000 settlement. This can add up.
Automatic Forwarding Unfortunately, the original system was subject to abuse as social media platforms tended to forward all copyrightnotices they received in order to limit their liability. These letters were used to effectively extort settlement money from alleged infringers.
All you have to do is add up the numbers and see how outrageous the settlement demands will be. It is not uncommon to see demands of $25,000 to $35,000 for merely downloading movies (where copyrightnotices and FBI warnings are not usually found) and to try to milk these people financially dry.
In the interests of full disclosure, readers should note that I wrote and submitted an amicus brief , on behalf of myself and four other intellectualproperty professors, in support of the copyright owner (Unicolors), in this case. Copyright Office before an infringement lawsuit could be filed. (For
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content