Copying Intellectual Property Law Related Rights 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
Parts 1 and 2 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here and here , and part 4 will be published on the blog shortly. Related rights. Special provisions for computer programs (Sections 69a et seqq. 3, second sentence UrhG.
The IPKat
DECEMBER 1, 2023
It is time to vote for your favourite intellectual property law books of 2023 in the annual IPKat Book of the Year Awards! The IPKat team continues to read and review as many brilliant IP books as possible, of which there are many, for the Kat community.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
DECEMBER 28, 2023
Readers are reminded that they can vote for their favourite intellectual property law books of 2023 in the annual IPKat Book of the Year Awards! Votes must be made via email before 15th January 2024 as per the instructions below.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
DECEMBER 20, 2022
This contribution is based on a paper published in 44 European Intellectual Property Law Review 595 (2022). . As is known, originality has always been the essential requirement of copyright law, and only works that show some minimum amount of this attribute usually fall within the scope of protection.
The IPKat
DECEMBER 2, 2022
Not only do many express wonder about how these systems work, but there is even doubt whether such users even have rights to such outputs. Let us briefly examine how these systems work and then consider how intellectual property law relates to them. The model does not contain any copies of works.
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 28, 2022
Under the Indonesian regulatory regime, ESPs are subject to various requirements and obligations related to, among other things, the. Intellectual property rights are a key consideration when it comes to NFTs because they contain art, music, videos, pictures, and other creations. cross-border transfer of personal data.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 5, 2022
In Gtflix , the CJEU held that when a claim relating to the dissemination of allegedly disparaging remarks on the internet is brought, the compensation for the resulting damage from that claim in one Member State may be sought before the courts of that same Member State. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data. Austro-Mechana, C-433/20.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content