Remove Copying Remove Fair Use Remove False Advertising Remove Registration
article thumbnail

TIL: “Texas Tamale” Is an Enforceable Trademark–Texas Tamale v. CPUSA2

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” But the trademark registration was over 5 years old, so it had become “incontestable.” Still, there should be many circumstances where descriptive fair use permits the defendant to use the term “Texas tamale” in the ad copy. ” The right answer should be “no one.”

Trademark 101
article thumbnail

comparison charts might infringe if lacking a disclaimer

43(B)log

24, 2022) This seems like a silly result to me, shifting the burden to comparative advertisers, but it's often much harder to get summary judgment in a trademark case than in comparable cases. PennEngineering claims a PEM family of marks and sued Peninsula for trademark infringement, counterfeiting, false advertising, and unfair competition.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Use In Good Faith? Will That Amount To Infringement

IP and Legal Filings

It owns multiple trade mark registrations for the word “Tiffany” in connection with “Decorative Art Objects Made in Whole or in Part of Precious or Semiprecious Metals” among others. Tiffany is world renowned jewellery brand famous for selling diamond engagement rings since 19 th century. ” The Sports Auth.,

article thumbnail

Dark Patterns Unmasked: Examining Their Influence on Digital Platforms and User Behaviour

SpicyIP

These patterns can intersect with the trademark and other intellectual property (IP) in various ways, although it’s important to note that the use of dark patterns is unethical and often violates principles of fair use and consumer protection.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

Fantasy Sports [Delhi High Court] In a suit alleging copyright infringement, HULM Entertainment argued that Fantasy Sports’ “MyFab11” sports fantasy app copies the trading and stock features and GUI of its “Exchange 22” app. HULM Entertainment v. First, in Toyota v. d) Other IP Developments 1. Meticulous Market Research Pvt.

IP 112
article thumbnail

WIPIP session 5: Anti-Circumvention

43(B)log

Allowed producers to control coffee machines by putting software in them; can prevent use, resale, using unsupported coffee. Usufructuary rights—use and benefit from property; interference w/right to repair and w/right to use it with other stuff by preventing interoperability. Property v. property: TM v. chattels; IP v.

Privacy 59
article thumbnail

Fourteenth Trademark Scholars' Roundtable, part 3 (Evidence)

43(B)log

Discussant: Mark Lemley Maybe corpus linguistics can help w/things like descriptiveness and nominative fair use, though skeptical about confusion or fame (b/c you need a standard). We could do things like market share analysis—but TM might not try to prevent copying others’ TMs in general. There is a morality for that.