43(B)log

MAY 22, 2023

May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare false advertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.

False Advertising 49

False Advertising Social Media Advertising Advertising 49

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 27, 2023

These patterns can intersect with the trademark and other intellectual property (IP) in various ways, although it’s important to note that the use of dark patterns is unethical and often violates principles of fair use and consumer protection.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property False Advertising Designs Design 52

43(B)log

MARCH 10, 2023

24, 2023) Previous decision here —really interesting attack on internet arbitrage; defendant copied Krikor’s eBay memorabilia photos and listed the memorabilia on its own site with a markup; anyone who bought from defendant would actually have defendant buy from Krikor and drop-shipped to the purchaser. Nor was the use of the photos fair use.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Copying 59

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 3, 2024

Allowed producers to control coffee machines by putting software in them; can prevent use, resale, using unsupported coffee. Usufructuary rights—use and benefit from property; interference w/right to repair and w/right to use it with other stuff by preventing interoperability. Property v. property: TM v. chattels; IP v.

Privacy 59

Privacy Fair Use Fanworks Government 59

43(B)log

AUGUST 3, 2023

Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Are the outputs copies of the training data? What to do?

Social Media 52

Social Media Fair Use Advertising Advertising 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

Fantasy Sports [Delhi High Court] In a suit alleging copyright infringement, HULM Entertainment argued that Fantasy Sports’ “MyFab11” sports fantasy app copies the trading and stock features and GUI of its “Exchange 22” app. HULM Entertainment v. d) Other IP Developments 1. Meticulous Market Research Pvt. Acko General Insurance.

IP 112

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 112

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

VIP Products, on the other hand, argued that their toy was protected under the doctrine of “fair use” as it was being used in a non-trademark sense, and that it was not likely to cause confusion among consumers. ” Id. In VIP Products v. Jack Daniels Products , 953 F.3d 3d 1170 , 1172 (9 th Cir.

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Brands 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 25, 2023

Discussant: Mark Lemley Maybe corpus linguistics can help w/things like descriptiveness and nominative fair use, though skeptical about confusion or fame (b/c you need a standard). We could do things like market share analysis—but TM might not try to prevent copying others’ TMs in general.

Trademark 72

Trademark Marketing Marketing Advertising 72