43(B)log

MAY 19, 2023

Wowwee sells a line of dolls called “My Avastars,” which plaintiffs allege were “copied directly from Roblox’s Classic Avatars.” Looking at the side by side pictures in the complaint, this is a bit hard to swallow, but the evidence of copying/references to Roblox clearly bleed over from the TM side.

Copying 94

Copying False Advertising Social Media Advertising 94

IIPRD

AUGUST 4, 2022

A Social Media Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple social media platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information. One of the most significant methods to safeguard material on social media is through copyright. Make intangible assets.

Social Media 45

Social Media Intellectual Property Non-Fungible Tokens Music 45

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

3, 2021) The parties compete in the market for custom landscape design services. “[I]n Natorp’s removed all of his photos from its website shortly after he complained, but the photos allegedly remained “online at various social media outlets including Natorp’s private website, Facebook, and Pinterest.” McCleese v. Natorp’s, Inc.,

Copying 64

Copying False Advertising Social Media Advertising 64

Copyright Lately

MARCH 31, 2024

To make matters worse, State Farm’s resident do-gooder “Jake” lands a Fonzie-style smack on the Crystal Castles machine to get it working—”suggesting falsely and disparagingly to consumers that Atari’s cabinets are low-quality, faulty, and/or unreliable.”

Copyright 78

Copyright Fair Use Social Media Artwork 78

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s false advertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the false advertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Social Media 59

43(B)log

DECEMBER 23, 2022

Although expressing some skepticism, the court found that they stated a valid false advertising claim. But buying a limited-time license to stream a digital copy of Yesterday was neither a tangible good nor a service under the CLRA. They allegedly watched the movie because they wanted to see De Armas and the scene in the movie.

False Advertising 72

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Social Media 72

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 17, 2021

Kaira also owns common law design marks which are displayed on the websites www.amul.com and www.amuldairy.com. The Defendants were advertising, marketing and selling milk products in Canada through LinkedIn in association with the trademark AMUL and claiming to be Kaira. Kaira also established trademark infringement. Disposition.

False Advertising 40

False Advertising Social Media Trademark Branding 40