IP and Legal Filings

JUNE 29, 2024

Certain sections like 2(qq) and 38, define a “performer” and specify whether a person’s personality falls under the definition of a performer, under which a performer’s right may be asserted, hence prohibiting the unapproved marketing of a performer’s work.

Personality Rights 82

Personality Rights Fair Use Privacy Intellectual Property Law 82

Velocity of Content

MARCH 16, 2023

After all, while we are pondering the weighty issue of future ownership, we are not focusing on the fundamental issue of wholesale copying of works to train AI in a wide variety of situations. I speculated that this was an attempt to avoid a messy fair use dispute. is being used as code.

Litigation 98

Litigation Fair Use Copying Derivative Work 98

43(B)log

AUGUST 11, 2021

Twain gave her a signed & inscribed copy after publication, which descendants donated to UMd decades back. Unsettled; hard to say Cord & family intentionally or even negligently sat on their rights. Did Twain make fair use? Definitely true that they weren’t entirely pragmatic. Seems unlikely.

Ownership 44

Ownership Moral Rights Copyright Publishing 44

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Court held that “diagnostic” under Section 3(i) should neither be construed narrowly, limited to only in-vivo or definitive diagnosis, nor broadly to include any process “relating to” diagnosis. The central issue here was whether Section 3(i) is restricted to only in vivo tests practices on the human body. HULM Entertainment v.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124