Copying Copyright Notice Fair Use Reference 
Velocity of Content
OCTOBER 19, 2023
The 1976 Act brought in many aspects of copyright with which we are now familiar, including codifying fair use in Section 107 (it previously had been applied on a common law basis). Harper & Row brought suit and The Nation argued that publishing the excerpts was a fair use.
Copyright Lately
JUNE 2, 2022
In a 30-page order, the district court largely denies both parties’ motions for summary judgment, finding triable issues on substantial similarity and fair use. and High Voltage Tattoo) asked the court to determine that the use of Sedlik’s photo as a reference image qualified as a fair use of the copyrighted work.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
MAY 3, 2024
Fair use provides some exceptions to copyright protection, allowing limited use of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner. Understanding legal and fair use is especially important in academic settings because dissemination of information often requires the use of evidence.
Velocity of Content
DECEMBER 6, 2023
Under what circumstances would the unauthorized use of copyrighted works to train AI models constitute fair use? law has no specific rules governing the use of copyrighted materials to train AI. Rather, such uses fall under the general copyright regime. TVEyes, Inc., 3d 169 (2d Cir.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MARCH 29, 2023
This claim was brought by a photographer–the population we thought would be using the CCB. But it was not a claim filed by Oppenheimer, but a claim referred to the CCB from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The citations for the basics of fair use do come from 9th circuit cases.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JANUARY 16, 2024
Rather than being programmed in the traditional way, a large language model is “trained” by copying massive amounts of text and extracting information from it. Books3 is a dataset of books derived from a copy of the contents of the “ Bibliotik private tracker ”. 1202(a)(1) by asserting copyright in the LLaMA models.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 14, 2024
The lawsuits claim that because the defendants copied their original works of authorship to use as training material for the LLMs, the AI companies are liable under the federal Copyright Act and various state tort laws. For a quick recap of the theories they are asserting, check out our recent AI Update.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
116 
Let's personalize your content