Remove Contracts Remove False Advertising Remove Reference
article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Roblox sued for copyright infringement, false advertising, trademark infringement, false association and false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and false advertising and unfair competition under California law.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

Hello, You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About Web Scraping Laws (Guest Blog Post, Part 2 of 2)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Someone has referred you here because you’ve said something wrong about the laws related to web scraping in the United States. You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About The First Amendment.” Trademark, copyright, trespass to chattels, the law of online contracts—none of this stuff is novel. Don’t worry!

Blogging 131
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Contract remedies again prove broader than false advertising for pandemic-related suits

43(B)log

Thus, some but not all breach of contract claims survived. References in Columbia’s marketing materials to “the on-campus experience” were often mere puffery “too vague to be enforced as a contract,” such as a statement in a University publication that “Columbia is an in-person kind of place.” So too for similar Pace claims.

article thumbnail

Monster wins permanent injunction against VPX in false advertising case

43(B)log

12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. A lost customer may constitute the loss of a relationship with a customer as well as reference to other potential customers.”

article thumbnail

TM claimant may add false advertising claims as direct competitor

43(B)log

Entrepreneur’s desire to bring forth a claim for false advertising against a competitor in a similar market is not unusual behavior.” Along with adding a defendant, Entrepreneur might eventually be allowed to add a false advertising claim, based on facts that were allegedly discovered only during Roach’s deposition.

article thumbnail

tortious interference claim from false advertising survives, but why bother?

43(B)log

AB allegedly began advertising for a similar product, claiming that its load bars have “30% more Holding Power than similar Disposable Load Bars,” allegedly an admitted reference to Logistick. 15, 2021) Logistick sells disposable load bars which are used to secure cargo freight during transport.

article thumbnail

Alleging sponsorship/endorsement confusion can't defeat clear nominative fair use

43(B)log

It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. PTRA argued that, because Pasadena has referred to the Rose Bowl Game as “the game” in the past, the Rose Bowl Game was readily identifiable without using the term.