This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that falseadvertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. Windstream has a 2-year contract. With Spectrum there are no contracts. In re Windstream Holdings, Inc., 2022 WL 5245633, No.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their falseadvertising.”
In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig., 30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. 14-MD-2542 (VSB), 2025 WL 354671 (S.D.N.Y.
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. eBay case from 2008. Implications.
Or, for that matter, hiQ Labs, who has effectively been run out of business by their ongoing litigation with LinkedIn, and who has been on the losing end of almost every key legal decision in their dispute with LinkedIn. And most website-scraper interactions don’t fit within those scraper-litigation patterns. Just ask BrandTotal.
In re Amazon Prime Video Litig., Though the “buy” button manifests consent to a contract, “certain terms and policies could fail to meet statutory standards of clearness and effectiveness.” 2024 WL 1138906, No. 2:22-cv-00401-RSM (W.D. It was also plausible that the TOS didn’t sufficiently disclose the restrictions.
Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss. The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” false designation of origin, and falseadvertising.
20, 2021) In this timeshare exit falseadvertisinglitigation, the court excludes Wyndham’s expert. Timeshare exit entities like defendant TET used “online advertising and oral sales pitches to timeshare owners to convince them to sign up for TET’s service.” Sussman, 2021 WL 4948099, No. 6:18-cv-2171-GAP-DCI (M.D.
He paid money to get extra visibility for his dating profile and claims he got poor results, so he sued Bumble for falseadvertising. And that evidence-preservation must be done in a way that it can convince a judge even if all of the relevant employees have turned over by the time of litigation. Alkutkar joined Bumble in 2016.
Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Any “exit” came from default.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
15, 2022) The court of appeals reversed summary judgment in favor of an insurer, and ordered partial summary judgment for the insured, on the duty to defend in underlying litigation based on advertising injury coverage for trade dress infringement (depicting allegedly infringing products) in the insured’s advertising.
5-hour Energy [a frequent litigant in this space] sued mainly over trademark infringement, but also alleged falseadvertising (and trademark dilution). The Policy here defines Advertising Injury as an injury “arising out of oral or written publication of material that libels or slanders.
for trademark infringement, falseadvertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.
The laundry list of accusations also included trademark dilution, falseadvertising, common law unjust enrichment, common law tortious interference with contract, and breach of settlement agreement.
and other unfair acts such as misappropriation of trade secrets, falseadvertising, breach of contract, and antitrust violations. In comparison to litigating in U.S.
The parties are involved in related patent litigation. The court grouped the Lanham Act falseadvertising and New Jersey statutory and common law unfair competition claims together. Breach of contract survived, though not the duplicative count for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
ABI claims it has attained significant goodwill throughout the United States and the world and that Defendants alleged misleading and falseadvertisements have caused irreparable damage to ABI’s reputation. ABI is further claiming Defendants’ actions constitute false designation of origin and falseadvertising in violation of 15 U.S.C.
and other unfair acts such as misappropriation of trade secrets, falseadvertising, breach of contract, and antitrust violations. In comparison to litigating in U.S.
They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in falseadvertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. See, e.g., In re Coca-Cola Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litig. (No.
If this litigation continues and defendants wish to repeat this argument, they should support their assertion that they own the Facebook page with authority.” But breach of fiduciary duty and contract claims survived, as did unjust enrichment and civil conspiracy.
In Re Folgers Coffee, Marketing Litig., cannister contains only 865 grams of ground coffee, meaning that if a consumer followed the instructions on the back of the cannister, she could make only 70% of the number of cups advertised on the Label. Plaintiffs sued for falseadvertising; the cases have been consolidated here.
3, 2021) The plaintiffs were a law firm that handles landlord-tenant actions, a non-profit corporation that assists pro se litigants in housing court matters, and a tenant advocate and organizer. The contract specifically didn’t guarantee updates and provided for invoices for any supplements if and when they became available. “It
In re Kind LLC “Healthy and All Natural” Litig., Other developments “sharply contracted” the scope of the claims to the “All Natural” claim on three product lines. 2022 WL 4125065, 15-MD-2645 (NRB), 15-MC-2645 (NRB) (S.D.N.Y. Previously, the court allowed NY, Florida, and California classes to proceed.
Those requirements will impose huge compliance costs, but those investments won’t prevent online marketplaces from being dragged into extraordinarily expensive and high-stakes litigation over eligibility for this defense. Normally trademark owners aren’t third-party beneficiaries of that contract. eBay rejected.
Safelite allegedly falselyadvertised that (1) “if damage spreads beyond the size of a dollar bill, a replacement will be necessary”; (2) “when a chip is smaller than a dollar bill, it can usually be repaired without replacing the windshield.” can be safe and is viable.” Were plaintiffs’ injuries proximately caused by Safelite?
MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. DNP advertises that it uses artificial intelligence” rather than “human knowledge.” But DNP isn’t actually licensed to practice law.
Apparently Consumer protection agency called Sephora to clarify the situation—there was no litigation. Certain procedural requirements: must be able to see & save a copy of the disclosures/contract w/in 15 days, via email receipt for example. NY, DC, WA are considering similar taxes so it’s a trend to watch.
The decisions in the first category, i.e., Top 10 IP Cases/Judgements (Topicality/Impact) reflect those that we thought were important from a topical point of view and were covered by the media in some way owing to the importance of parties litigating or the issue being considered or for impact on industry and innovation/creativity ecosystem etc.
Yodice alleged breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and consumer protection falseadvertising claims. It likewise remanded for further consideration of the GBL falseadvertising claims. It likewise remanded for further consideration of the GBL falseadvertising claims. Pace Univ., 4th 204 (2d Cir.
Interested in sellers’ understanding of the contracts. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? 3) Mark McKenna—not formalism but absence of guardrails imposed on realism in classical unfair competition. Lay sellers don’t have strong understanding of laws and/or don’t feel bound by them.
for the losses caused by intentionally and wrongfully interfering with the Debtors’ customer contracts and good will. Comment: This is an interesting question given that TM/advertising people tend to define goodwill differently than general business valuation people, especially in the TM/falseadvertising context.
Some of them described themselves and why they read the blog: “A senior director on our legal team forwarded one of your blog posts to a few of us on the litigation team a few days into me starting in-house. ” “Im a litigator often specializing in internet law related issues, particularly under Section 230.
Healthvana sued in May 2020 for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising in violation of both federal and state law, as well for cybersquatting under ACPA. Telebrands’ TV ad didn’t use the word “Covid” [I bet litigation counsel is grateful for FDA compliance efforts carried out in writing the copy!].
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content