This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In reliance, AHBP allegedly hired employees and designers, consulted with lawyers, accountants, biologists and virologists, rented warehouse and office space, and entered into contracts with buyers in Argentina. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. Comment: This is a proximate cause question.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their falseadvertising.”
But if I stopped what I was doing to write a personal message every time I saw a blogger with no legal background shilling for a web-scraping company or a half-asleep aggregator journalist [FN] spewing ignorance online about the laws that govern web scraping, I wouldn’t get out much.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. Many sites have multiple overlapping governance documents with similar names, so it’s fair for consumers to expect accurate specificity. sought to send the case to arbitration. The district court disagreed. Warner Bros.
State law governs how and when pharmacists and health care professionals can and must make generic substitutions. As to the email threads, the presence of the word “generic” in an email thread didn’t “transform an otherwise innocuous email into falseadvertising.” This was the basis of the counterclaims.
The court thought that this wasn’t material, but conflated falseadvertising and false association (which was plausibly alleged). Zillow arguably presents itself as a resource to consumers when in fact, it is an advertising platform for agents, but that’s true of almost all websites.
4, 2022) Frequent IP claimant Lisa Frank is in court this time over a failed deal with a vegan cosmetics company, whose contract aspects I will ignore. reached the point of exasperation, terminated the agreement with Glamour Dolls, and contacted the Federal Government. CV-21-00228-TUC-SHR, 2022 WL 3098042 (D.
The falseadvertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., The court now found the breach of contract claim sufficiently pled. This allegedly breached Nexo’s duty of good faith and fair dealing and constituted a violation of California’s UCL.
Breach of contract: The complaint failed to allege specific promises sufficient to form an implied contract to provide on-campus services. Unjust enrichment: Unlike some treatments of this type of claim, the opinion here dismissed unjust enrichment as duplicative of the breach of contract claim.
So too for breach of contract claims: CUTPA provides that “[a]n action under [CUTPA] may not be brought more than three years after the occurrence of a violation.” But claims under the consumer protection laws of other states were governed by their timeliness rules, not Connecticut’s.
The ”Official Rules” stated, in relevant part (uncapitalized because I actually would like you to be able to read this): “The California courts (state and federal) shall have sole jurisdiction of any controversies regarding the promotion and the laws of the state of California shall govern the promotion. So, which contractgoverned?
Sirius XM customer-service agents are allegedly instructed to tell those subscribers who do find out about the Fee “that the Fee is a government-related fee and/or that [it] is outside of Sirius XM’s control.” The “duty to read” terms properly “called to [a consumer’s] attention” does not imply a “duty to ferret out contract provisions.
Businesses harm consumers only in a few ways—falseadvertising, monopoly prices, defective products. If the law says that Google is a common carrier, expecting more speech governance is irrational. Amazon may also be able to redefine information by contract. But these roles support only very thin social norms.
Scientists and government regulators allegedly identified Delta “as one of many companies who have grossly misstated the actual carbon reduction produced by their carbon offset portfolio.” Berrin alleged she paid a price premium based on the deception, asserting the usual California statutory claims. Wolens, 513 U.S.
In civil cases, courts have recognized a denial of due process only if the government actively thwarts a party from obtaining a lawyer or prevents it from communicating with counsel. There was no “indirect right to fund and retain the counsel through an insurance contract.”
GCU isn’t permitted to contract with any third party for these services. If, as the FTC seems to contend, Defendants made false representations to the IRS to secure GCU’s nonprofit classification,” then there wouldn’t be a binding government determination of status.
Thus, the 10 lifetime NOCIs threshold is a ruse to mislead people that smaller services aren’t governed by the law, when of course they will be. Normally trademark owners aren’t third-party beneficiaries of that contract. What’s Regulated? Also, product shots have been a constant source of copyright litigation.
Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A Rather than engaging this contract law issue directly, the court rules for YouTube on Section 230 grounds: Lady Freethinker’s claims ultimately seek to treat Google as the publisher or speaker of content provided by another information content provider.
Harms: speech, consumer protection (falseadvertising/disappointed expectations), competition/antitrust, innovation/fair use, interoperability, accessibility, security and privacy, environmental harms of unrepairable devices. Yes, privacy, defamation, and property are at the governance seam. Cablevision.
Certain procedural requirements: must be able to see & save a copy of the disclosures/contract w/in 15 days, via email receipt for example. Hecho in Mexico is a certification; must be (majority) produced in Mexico, not precisely corresponding to AOs or GIs, but permit coming from Mexican government. Mattero v.
The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.
Interested in sellers’ understanding of the contracts. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? Second, Rogers does not impose a materiality requirement, and it is hard to see how the government has a compelling interest in protecting consumers from confusion they don’t care about.
” “I am a law professor who teaches and writes about intellectual property and entertainment law with a focus on trademarks and falseadvertising, particularly online.” I think the internet in general an[d] Social Media and AI specifically, should be open to the 1st amendment and not interfered by government.
She then emailed Gordon: [j]ust to confirm I should not be expecting Nancy to come at us to try and secure that weekend since you have a contract with White Elephant correct? The court relied on Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A and did not analyze the claims as Lanham Act falseadvertising.
Plaintiffs brought claims under California’s FalseAdvertising Law, Unfair Competition Law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act against Coinbase and Marden-Kane, Inc., Issues of contract formation may not be delegated to an arbitrator. a company hired by Coinbase to design, market, and execute the sweepstakes.
At a more theoretical level, these algorithmically optimized registrations help show why applications have spiked so much—other important institutions, like Amazon and the Chinese government, are using the PTO for their own purposes. Example from recent case: Abrahams v. Simplify Compliance, LLC, 2021 WL 1197732, No. 19-3009 (RDM) (D.D.C.
Healthvana sued in May 2020 for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising in violation of both federal and state law, as well for cybersquatting under ACPA. Several hundred thousand bottles of hand sanitizer, however, had already been produced with the older, ‘Healthvana’ label. Telebrands won summary judgment.
” By definition, every contract of every type involves a bilateral exchange of contract consideration, so this logic suggests that every contract represents a statutory “sale”? Trump The post Court Revives Indiana AG’s FalseAdvertising Case Against TikTok–State v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content