Remove Contracts Remove Designs Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

In reliance, AHBP allegedly hired employees and designers, consulted with lawyers, accountants, biologists and virologists, rented warehouse and office space, and entered into contracts with buyers in Argentina. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived. Comment: This is a proximate cause question.

article thumbnail

Another API (c) case with false advertising and contract claims too

43(B)log

Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and false advertising claims survived. And they allegedly copied golf courses created on Perfect Golf’s course design platform. Thus, the court dismissed the contract claim without prejudice if there are “substantial changes in the law.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Measuring device (c)able under Star Athletica; ignoring Dastar, court also allows false advertising claim

43(B)log

He posted the Cube design and 3D print files on Thingiverse.com, the largest site for 3D print objects. Kitchen Cube also stated on its website that “we designed and manufactured every kitchen measuring device in one easy to use gadget.” The breach of contract claim survived. False advertising: Only ok against Kitchen Cube.

article thumbnail

Dastar doesn't bar allegedly false advertising about source of planned development services

43(B)log

False advertising: This one survived: By listing LStar developments under the heading “Oak City Representative Developments,” “the proposal necessarily implies that defendant Oak City developed those properties.” False designation of origin: Failed to state a passing off claim, but Dastar didn’t bar a reverse passing off claim.

article thumbnail

YouTube Isn’t Liable for User Uploads of Animal Abuse Videos–Lady Freethinker v. YouTube

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A Rather than engaging this contract law issue directly, the court rules for YouTube on Section 230 grounds: Lady Freethinker’s claims ultimately seek to treat Google as the publisher or speaker of content provided by another information content provider.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protect Apple’s App Store from Claims Over Cryptocurrency Theft–Diep v. Apple

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). False Advertising. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. ” Section 230. eBay case from 2008. Implications.

article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Roblox sued for copyright infringement, false advertising, trademark infringement, false association and false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and false advertising and unfair competition under California law.

Copying 94