This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In reliance, AHBP allegedly hired employees and designers, consulted with lawyers, accountants, biologists and virologists, rented warehouse and office space, and entered into contracts with buyers in Argentina. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived. Comment: This is a proximate cause question.
Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived. And they allegedly copied golf courses created on Perfect Golf’s course design platform. Thus, the court dismissed the contract claim without prejudice if there are “substantial changes in the law.”
He posted the Cube design and 3D print files on Thingiverse.com, the largest site for 3D print objects. Kitchen Cube also stated on its website that “we designed and manufactured every kitchen measuring device in one easy to use gadget.” The breach of contract claim survived. Falseadvertising: Only ok against Kitchen Cube.
Falseadvertising: This one survived: By listing LStar developments under the heading “Oak City Representative Developments,” “the proposal necessarily implies that defendant Oak City developed those properties.” Falsedesignation of origin: Failed to state a passing off claim, but Dastar didn’t bar a reverse passing off claim.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. The court started with a presumption favoring the admissibility of surveys. Poret didnt test the exact language Keurig used, but that wasnt fatal.
Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A Rather than engaging this contract law issue directly, the court rules for YouTube on Section 230 grounds: Lady Freethinker’s claims ultimately seek to treat Google as the publisher or speaker of content provided by another information content provider.
In setting out the injunction, the court states that Joneca would be free to explain during retailer bids and sales presentations that its products have a certain horsepower input, or alternatively, to explain that InSinkErators AC induction motor design requires more output horsepower to provide the same level of performance as Jonecas PMDC motor.
The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). FalseAdvertising. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. ” Section 230. eBay case from 2008. Implications.
Roblox sued for copyright infringement, falseadvertising, trademark infringement, false association and falsedesignation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and falseadvertising and unfair competition under California law.
Falseadvertising: Plaintiffs didn’t allege that Nobelle altered the merchandise in any way; “instead, the false statement arises from implication, from the fact that Nobelle is selling products that are not theirs to sell and, in the case of ‘The Line’ items, products it does not have the authority to sell.”
Even if Google’s conduct could be interpreted as a technical violation of many websites’ notoriously overbroad terms of service, their conduct doesn’t meet the criteria for most online breach of contract disputes. Trademark, copyright, trespass to chattels, the law of online contracts—none of this stuff is novel.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. The design elements use “a contrasting font color” making the notice legible on the dark background. The account formation process included a screen where a user could proceed only by clicking on the “play” button: Warner Bros.
Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss. The Lanham Act claims were styled as false association, “false association with celebrity status,” falsedesignation of origin, and falseadvertising.
CC has a recent trademark registration for a design mark “consist[ing] of the stylized wording ‘COLOR COPPER.COM”, [with] a diamond shape between the wording ‘COLOR’ and ‘COPPER’ made up of four smaller diamonds, each diamond having a pattern inside of it,” COPPER.COM disclaimed. There’s no written agreement” will do it.]
for trademark infringement, falseadvertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.
It claims to focus on “counterfeits” that could harm consumer “health and safety,” but those are both lies designed to make the bill seem narrower and more balanced than it actually is. Normally trademark owners aren’t third-party beneficiaries of that contract. A new frontier for a trade war.].
ABI claims it has attained significant goodwill throughout the United States and the world and that Defendants alleged misleading and falseadvertisements have caused irreparable damage to ABI’s reputation. ABI is further claiming Defendants’ actions constitute falsedesignation of origin and falseadvertising in violation of 15 U.S.C.
4, 2022) Frequent IP claimant Lisa Frank is in court this time over a failed deal with a vegan cosmetics company, whose contract aspects I will ignore. LFI allegedly used the “concepts, designs and ideas” from GDI’s samples to launch a new line of products with a larger cosmetics company, Morphe. Insider Inc.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.
Enigma sued its competitor Malwarebytes for Lanham Act falseadvertising and NY business torts for designating its products as “malicious,” “threats,” and “potentially unwanted programs” (PUPs). The district court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that these designations were “non-actionable statements of opinion.”
They also assigned their entire right, title and interest in any idea, invention, design of a useful article, computer program and related documentation, as well as any other work of authorship made or conceived by them that relate to the actual or anticipated business for or on behalf of MaddenCo or its subsidiaries.
BD alleged that Medline made false and misleading statements that BD had to change its original design as a result of the patent litigation, that the original was found to infringe one or more of Medline’s patents, that the original was discontinued, and that the reverted design would negatively impact BD’s ability to supply sufficient inventory.
Meredith alleged that Vacasa “has embarked on a smear campaign surgically targeted at [Plaintiff’s] homeowner customers, designed to unfairly snuff out that competition.” The court found that the alleged statements weren’t “commercial advertising” covered by the Lanham Act.
1, 2024) “Qoins is a financial technology company that collects funds from its customers and disburses payments to designated creditors in order to help its customers pay off their debts.” The court mostly denied Qoins’ motion to dismiss the resulting claims, including breach of contract and libel. Qoins Technologies, Inc.,
They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the FalseAdvertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in falseadvertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. UCL: The UCL, California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq.,
6, 2021) (R&R) Shenzhen sought a declaratory judgment that a design patent for a toy gnome figurine was unenforceable and invalid, given that defendant/counter-plaintiff Tatiana Mironova allegedly purchased its stuffed gnome toys, then switched manufacturers and obtained a patent for an identical ornamental design without authorization.
In fall 2023, Overjet launched its “Anatomical Structures Visualization Tool” for Overjet Caries Assist, which introduced the relevant coloring scheme and design. It also allegedly “selected the design and colors to help with brand identification; the purple, for example, complements Overjet’s purple brand color.” Overjet, Inc.
30, 2022) “This case began as a routine suit for breach of a noncompete provision in an employment contract. Lanham Act falseadvertising: Failing to delete email and voicemail accounts is not “commercial advertising or promotion.” Continental Diamond Tool Corp., 2022 WL 2355481, No. 1:21-CV-274-HAB (N.D.
It contracts with Charities Aid Foundation of America, which in turn delivers donated funds to designated charities. For certain “celebrity experiences,” 60% of the money donated goes to CAFA to be paid to the designated charity, but for Omaze-owned campaigns, Omaze keeps 85%. The court granted the motion to dismiss in part.
MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. DNP advertises that it uses artificial intelligence” rather than “human knowledge.” But DNP isn’t actually licensed to practice law.
Whether the court or the arbitrator would determine which contract applied was an issue “for judicial determination unless the parties clearly and unmistakably provide otherwise.” But the dispute here wasn’t about the scope of the agreement; it was whether the agreement had been superseded by another, separate contract.
The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.
The breach of warranty claims were properly dismissed because MacNaughton failed to allege proper notice and privity of contract. Yet, if the company falselyadvertised that you could ‘blow a bubble bigger than your own head,’ it is plausible that a reasonable buyer could be misled.”
21, 2023) ExeGi sued Brookfield for state and federal falseadvertising/tortious interference. Its label doesn’t list the exact quantity of each bacteria species or strain designation, noting instead that its blend of bacteria is proprietary. ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. Brookfield Pharmaceuticals, LLC, F.Supp.3d 20-CV-192-JPS (E.D.
For modern designers, this may be both a blessing and a curse. Social media influencers sign contracts with businesses to promote their products by providing original content for such brands. Falseadvertising should be avoided when defaming a product. Build your market reputation.
Other developments “sharply contracted” the scope of the claims to the “All Natural” claim on three product lines. At deposition, he said he was “test[ing]” the plaintiffs’ theory of liability, but the court interpreted his answers as showing that his questions were designed to support that theory.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
for the losses caused by intentionally and wrongfully interfering with the Debtors’ customer contracts and good will. Comment: This is an interesting question given that TM/advertising people tend to define goodwill differently than general business valuation people, especially in the TM/falseadvertising context.
The Trademark’s Function Under Branding The most basic of all definitions of a trademark may be termed as a sign of identification and is generally by a word, spelling, logo, slogan, or design, which can use an identifying and differentiating goods or services from one person or entity as opposed to another.
In this recent case, Epic sought to register this design for "downloadable video game software"—the Loot Llama in Fortnite, which serves as a resource cache for players. 30, 2021) Plaintiff Daniel Abrahams formerly contracted with a publisher to author a series related to the Fair Labor Standards Act. 19-3009 (RDM) (D.D.C.
What about falseadvertising? LOVE sculpture , Wikimedia HOPE sculpture, Wikimedia In 2007, Plaintiff and Indiana created the HOPE image, similar to the LOVE image, which began competing with the LOVE image. Indiana didnt claim copyright in the HOPE image either. Thus, there was no actionable misrepresentation.
” “I am a law professor who teaches and writes about intellectual property and entertainment law with a focus on trademarks and falseadvertising, particularly online.” ” “Hi, I’m [name], a Gen Z with a small marketing and web design business.
Interested in sellers’ understanding of the contracts. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? Said: note that MLM companies may also have IP troubles [Lularoe and leggings designs], which might also provide an interesting set of comparisons. Interviews/surveys? How do they make that happen?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content