Remove Contracts Remove Definition Remove False Advertising Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform. more images from the complaint Interestingly, the contract/tortious interference claims against US resident defendants had to be arbitrated because of Roblox's own TOS.

Copying 94
article thumbnail

adult venue's insurer did not successfully exclude ads from ad injury coverage

43(B)log

Princeton insured Wonderland from 2016-2018 (with a broad exclusion for defamation, invasion of privacy, and various forms of advertising injury in the second year called the Exhibitions and Related Marketing Exclusion), and agreed to defend the club but reserved the right to deny insurance coverage.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

dueling SJ motions lose in energy drink case; jury will decide whether "Super Creatine" is "creatine"

43(B)log

19, 2022) The parties compete in the market for energy drinks. VPX (Vital) makes BANG, which now contains creatyl-l-leucine (CLL), “a novel ingredient marketed under the trademark ‘Super Creatine.’ … Defendants claim that CLL is more stable and more bioavailable than other forms of creatine.”

article thumbnail

“it appears difficult for a defendant, innocent or not, to defend himself in a claim for disgorgement of profits"

43(B)log

29, 2024) Previously, after a bench trial, the court found Albion liable for falsely advertising its caulk dispensing guns as “Made in the USA.” After more evidence, the court found that Albion adequately supported its unclean-hands defense—that Newborn had also made false USA origin claims—until early 2007.

article thumbnail

"Zestimates" are nonactionable opinion, but state law might govern alleged listing agent misrepresentation

43(B)log

The complaint didn’t identify specific advertising statements that would plausibly misrepresent what the Zestimates were, “or even a particular home estimate produced by the Zestimate tool that allegedly conflicts with the real market value.” CUTPA: Covers both deceptiveness and unfairness.

article thumbnail

Amending Your TOS? Better Use a Clickthrough Process, Not Email Notice–Alkutkar v. Bumble

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

He paid money to get extra visibility for his dating profile and claims he got poor results, so he sued Bumble for false advertising. Bumble made a series of miscues, including several problems with the email notice and the lack of a definitive screenshot of its blocker card. Alkutkar used the dating app Bumble. What went right?

article thumbnail

"The usual California claims"

43(B)log

They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the False Advertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in false advertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. See, e.g., In re Coca-Cola Products Marketing & Sales Practices Litig. (No.