This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
But the suit, in which 24-year-old influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford accuses another influencer, 22-year-old Alyssa Sheil, of copying both her posts and her style, may have an outsized effect on the law around online contentcreation. Sydney Nicole LLC v. Alyssa Sheil LLC , 1:24-cv-00423-RP (W.D.
A brand that uses material generated by AI in a public-facing manner – such as in an ad or a socialmedia post – could run the risk of infringing on another’s rights, for which the brand could be held liable. For more information on these issues, read our sister blogs here , here , and here.
The conventional internet and socialmedia, as we know it, is referred to as the Web2.0 – Data protection and privacy issues. The expansive contentcreation opportunities in the metaverse have also produced diverse legal questions with a plethora of literature maturing each day. – Jurisdictional issues.
To create its product, Clearview scraped billions of publicly available photos from websites and socialmedia platforms. Such class actions can be considered part of the evolution of the regulatory landscape dedicated to Generative AI. The plaintiffs argue that such conduct would replicate that of Clearview.
This includes thousands of books the complete Wikipedia and nearly a trillion words extracted from blogs socialmedia and various online platforms. In such cases, the responsibility for the content generated by “ChatGPT” may fall on the ‘individuals or organizations’ that developed, trained, and deployed the AI model.
Creativity & Remuneration With , Between , & Via AI Agents Here, we envision that a new framework for contentcreation and exchange is emerging. In this AI-powered framework, content creators and users will interact via AI agents. Each of the authors of this paper already has their own “ AI knowledge twin.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content