IPilogue
DECEMBER 12, 2022
TME utilized a “patented voice synthesis technology” called “Lingyin Engine”, which the company claims can “quickly and vividly replicate singers’ voices to produce original songs of any style and language.” million Canadian Dollars.
Trademark and Copyright Law Blog
DECEMBER 1, 2021
While patents and trademarks often receive the lion’s share of an organization’s intellectual property focus, copyrights comprise a critical third prong to a healthy overarching IP strategy – even for companies whose products and services involve little or no content creation.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 28, 2023
One area where AI has already made significant inroads is in content creation. With the help of AI-powered writing assistants, businesses and individuals can generate high-quality content with minimal effort. Patent law has about a year’s head start on this issue, but the decisions have not been pro-AI.
Intellectual Property Office Blog
JUNE 29, 2021
move.ai, a UK based technology company will explain how it is seeking to democratise content creation by enabling lower cost filming of virtual reality scenes using artificial intelligence. To do that they needed patents, design rights, trade marks and copyright to help them.
IIPRD
JUNE 9, 2024
When we talk about IPR in the metaverse various types of Intellectual Properties come into the picture, for example, copyrights, patents, and trademarks. The Judicial POV There have been various representative cases that are widely known for utilizing third-party content about copyright without genuine permission or license.
Intepat
NOVEMBER 26, 2024
These disputes often arise from patent, trademark, or copyright infringement claims, which can lead to costly litigation and significant damages. In India, the importance of IP insurance has been underscored by the growing number of patent disputes in recent years.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 22, 2023
Thaler’s appeal to the Federal Circuit and petition for certiorari in his analogous patent case were both unsuccessful. That’s because the court repeatedly says numerous times in different ways: no human creation = no copyright. Concluding Thoughts Again, not a surprising result.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
94 
Let's personalize your content