Remove Content Creation Remove Information Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Safeguarding the Future at the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence, Data Privacy, and Intellectual Property Rights

IP and Legal Filings

AI is altering the way the creation, consumption, and security of digital content and comes up with creative solutions for complicated problems dealing with data analysis and content creation. AI system training is an extensive process that predominantly entails the receipt of extensive amounts of data.

article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Google , which recognized property interest in personal information). By failing to do so prior to scraping the internet, the defendants did not allow all the class members a right to delete their personal information collected by the defendants, and a right to opt out of the use of that information, which was used to build the Products.

Fair Use 137
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Copyright and Artificial Intelligence in Music Creation

IP and Legal Filings

In such cases, the responsibility for the content generated by “ChatGPT” may fall on the ‘individuals or organizations’ that developed, trained, and deployed the AI model. Additionally, the widespread use of “ChatGPT” raises concerns about data privacy and regulation. Beyond copyright, data privacy raises its head.

Music 103
article thumbnail

The Potential Risks of ChatGPT and Other Generative AI

LexBlog IP

First, generative AI is only as good and accurate as the information on which it was trained. harmful instructions or biased content.” law, to receive trade secret protection, a company must make a reasonable effort to conceal that information from the public. Additionally, under current U.S. Kristen Maaherra , 114 F.3d

article thumbnail

Does IP Law Protect Influencers’ Aesthetics?–Gifford v. Sheil (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

But the suit, in which 24-year-old influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford accuses another influencer, 22-year-old Alyssa Sheil, of copying both her posts and her style, may have an outsized effect on the law around online content creation.

article thumbnail

Metaverse And The Changing Dynamics Of IP Law

Intepat

The visual technology and design capabilities are developing at a rapid pace where the metaverse will allow users to interact with virtual objects in real life with real-time information. – Data protection and privacy issues. – Jurisdictional issues. A broader analysis indicates that quite a lot is yet to be answered.

IP 52
article thumbnail

‘Google Zero’: Incentives & Remuneration in a New Era of ‘Agentic’ Copyright

Kluwer Copyright Blog

What happens to the Internet when major tech companies no longer support references to content creators? What happens to information created by online newspapers, magazines, and bloggers if Google does not provide links to their content? In this AI-powered framework, content creators and users will interact via AI agents.

Copyright 105