Remove Content Creation Remove Designs Remove Information Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Google , which recognized property interest in personal information). By failing to do so prior to scraping the internet, the defendants did not allow all the class members a right to delete their personal information collected by the defendants, and a right to opt out of the use of that information, which was used to build the Products.

Fair Use 132
article thumbnail

Metaverse And The Changing Dynamics Of IP Law

Intepat

The visual technology and design capabilities are developing at a rapid pace where the metaverse will allow users to interact with virtual objects in real life with real-time information. The conventional internet and social media, as we know it, is referred to as the Web2.0 – Data protection and privacy issues.

IP 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

‘Google Zero’: Incentives & Remuneration in a New Era of ‘Agentic’ Copyright

Kluwer Copyright Blog

What happens to the Internet when major tech companies no longer support references to content creators? What happens to information created by online newspapers, magazines, and bloggers if Google does not provide links to their content? In this AI-powered framework, content creators and users will interact via AI agents.

Copyright 101
article thumbnail

Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Because negates Section 230 on two independent grounds (FOSTA and content creation), Mindgeek has two separate reasons it could lose. ” The defendants argued that Roommates’ “encourage illegal content” standard only applied if the service required or compelled users to provide only illegal content. .”

Blogging 122