Remove Content Creation Remove Copying Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

2000) (“ copying an entire work militates against a finding of fair use. ”). Such class actions can be considered part of the evolution of the regulatory landscape dedicated to Generative AI. 3d 723, 743 (9th Cir. 2019); Worldwide Church of God vs Phila. Church of God, Inc., 3d 110, 1118 (9th Cir. 161 recalling the precedent Calhoun v.

Fair Use 137
article thumbnail

Does IP Law Protect Influencers’ Aesthetics?–Gifford v. Sheil (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

But the suit, in which 24-year-old influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford accuses another influencer, 22-year-old Alyssa Sheil, of copying both her posts and her style, may have an outsized effect on the law around online content creation. On first read, I thought the suit was a stretch, and Im not the only one.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Potential Risks of ChatGPT and Other Generative AI

LexBlog IP

5] In addition to the above, there are privacy, security, ethical, and other legal risks to consider when using this technology or allowing any third party to access internal customer records and business data. See, for example, the video Expedia released on Twitter to show how its ChatGPT plugin operates.

article thumbnail

ANI Media v. Open AI : The Opt-Out Strategy

SpicyIP

This form, as of today, leads to a page that states: “ As of October 25, 2023, we’ve migrated this form to our privacy request portal. Please visit privacy.openai.com to submit your user content opt out request.” The content served purely to extract patterns and information rather than reproduce creative expression.

Fair Use 104