This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
a patentprosecution bar that would preclude certain attorneys representing plaintiff from performing patentprosecution work for a period of two years following the conclusion of the action; and 2. an order allowing each side the opportunity to object before its confidential information was shared.
In an interesting development, the CIC recently rejected an RTI application concerning information on IPRS’ compliance with the Copyright Act, upholding privacy for private organizations and confidentiality of inquiry reports that have not been tabled in front of the Parliament. Kartikeya is a second-year law student of the LL.B.
And unfortunately, some continue making news for AI disasters such as disclosing confidential information and citing nonexistent case law. Most are at least exploring AI and considering where it may fit, if anywhere, in their law practice.
In keeping with precedent, a judge in the District of Delaware issued an oral order restricting the extent of permissible activities for litigation counsel before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. By: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
The parties agreed on a bar prohibiting, for a two-year period, those who accessed the opposing party’s highly confidential information from participating in patentprosecution related to the relevant subject matter, i.e., nasal treatment. May 7, 2024). By: Jones Day
These changes will help make practitioners’ activities at the USPTO more transparent, permitting identification of potential conflicts while also protecting client confidentialities. Nonetheless, patent agents and attorneys may need to modify their practice to comply with these new provisions.
A Look at the Revised PatentProsecution Timelines in the Draft Patent Amendment Rules The Draft Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2023 were recently published in the Gazette of India, with public comments invited by September 22. Md Sabeeh Ahmad writes on the proposed changes to the timelines in the patentprosecution process.
A Utah federal judge has barred Maschoff Brennan attorneys from certain patentprosecution for Lifetime Products during infringement litigation that provides it with access to a direct competitor's confidential technical information.
Employers will now have one less tool to prevent former workers, including both former employees and independent contractors, from starting a competing business using trade secrets or other confidential information gained from their former employment.
Developing patentprosecution strategies to facilitate compliance with the Notice. Reviewing your patentprosecution files for cases of strategic importance to your company. Preserving confidentiality and privilege. Replying to USPTO requests for information.
Discovery in patent cases often requires parties to produce confidential technical, business, and financial information. How do stipulated protective orders protect confidential information? What types of restrictions do stipulated protective orders impose on the disclosure and use of confidential information?
Under this act, the Commissioner of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has the authority to highlight patent applications for scrutiny by U.S. various three-letter and four-letter government agencies), ensuring certain innovations remain confidential. defense departments (e.g.,
Under this act, the Commissioner of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has the authority to highlight patent applications for scrutiny by U.S. various three-letter and four-letter government agencies), ensuring certain innovations remain confidential. defense departments (e.g.,
Under this act, the Commissioner of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has the authority to highlight patent applications for scrutiny by U.S. various three-letter and four-letter government agencies), ensuring certain innovations remain confidential. defense departments (e.g.,
Coming back to NIA, among other things , the NIA Act also became known for its objective to codify and consolidate the law of confidentiality and trade secrets – something for which there is no specific law in India. One pertinent post on this subject was from this month in 2010 called the Patent Eligibility and the Logic of Law and Science.
Delhi High Court Comes Down Heavily on the Patent Office for Delay in Passing the Order Image by Freepik DHC comes down on the Patent Office for a four-year delay in issuing an order. Read this post by SpicyIP intern Jyotpreet on what this means for the delays in patentprosecution timelines.
For example, patents protect inventions, whereas copyrights protect written or recorded expressive content; trademarks protect words, symbols, logos, designs, and slogans that identify or distinguish products or services; and trade secrets protect confidential business information.
The Rules introduce monumental changes in the patent regime with far-reaching implications. Most notably, the amendments pertaining to fixed deadlines for different procedures promise to be useful changes in quickening the patentprosecution timeline.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content