This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
With war still raging in Ukraine, writing about the collateral damage to Russia’s cinema industry seems vanishingly unimportant. Sony Pictures, Paramount, and Universal left the Russian market, some celebrated their exit as a positive for local cinema. When Disney, Warner Bros., companies should be considered fair game.
When movies are recorded directly from cinema screens, the resulting pirate copy is known as a ‘cam’, regardless of the device used – camcorder or otherwise. Double-whammy events like these aren’t exactly common in the UK, especially given the alleged quality and the obvious threat to the market.
Police IntellectualProperty Crime Unit. Significant rightsholders facing challenges in the UK can seek help from the fraud specialists at the Police IntellectualProperty Crime Unit. Sources confirm that the copies were traced back to two multi-screen cinemas, both of them in Liverpool, the location mentioned by PIPCU.
Moreover, Russia’s cinemamarket seemed to also be bouncing back since the start of COVID. According to data from the International Union of Cinemas (UNIC), represented in the table below, Russia was one of the major territories that performed strongly in its recovery in cinema admissions. million in 2021.
IntellectualProperty, More Conflict Thus far, diminished access to various types of licensed intellectualproperty has prompted mostly unofficial responses in Russia. A current proposal envisages Russian cinemas legally screening foreign movies without rightsholders’ permission but with some kind of payment.
In common with Russia, Belarus relies on intellectualproperty owned by foreign rightsholders that are currently unable or unwilling to supply and/or license it. So, to ensure legal access to pirated movies, music, TV shows and software, the government drafted a new law to restrict intellectualproperty rights.
The Basque Consumer Institute imposed a fine of 30,000 euros on a cinema chain due to the controversial practice of prohibiting the entry of food purchased outside its facilities. La entrada Ending forced food purchases at cinemas se publicó primero en OlarteMoure | IntellectualProperty.
“At a basic level – and common to all the technical devices mentioned – AAPA would like to see the production, marketing and distribution of any device which can be used to infringe IP made illegal” – Sheila Cassells. What’s AAPA’s position there? As for the mobile phone, it’s an infringement machine.
When citizens first began screening pirated Hollywood movies in cinemas, Russian entertainment groups condemned them for it. Three months later, a dejected cinema industry chief said that he couldn’t blame venues for trying to stay alive. ” Russia Understands Value of IntellectualProperty.
Introduction The media and entertainment industry is a broad and ever-evolving domain that includes several industries, including music, cinema, television, fashion, and more. In this sector, intellectualproperty (IP) regulations are essential for defending the rights of inventors, artists, and producers.
Over the last 18 months, various ideas and proposals have leaned toward limiting or even nullifying Western entertainment companies’ intellectualproperty rights in response to their withdrawal from the Russian market. Federal Law No. 46-FZ The bill submitted in April seeks amendments to the provisions of Federal Law No.
The author argues that copyright holders would do well to heed this wisdom before entering into litigation, as exemplified by a recent decision from the Swedish Patent and Market Court in case PMT 2401-21.
Android-based set-top devices have saturated the market in recent years, and it’s not uncommon for households to have several; downstairs, upstairs, and probably at least one in a drawer. For devices that enter the local market without certification, Anatel regularly reports various actions to remove them.
The ‘Australian Film/TV Bodies’ submission is the work of mostly American companies including Disney, Netflix, Paramount, Sony, Universal, Warner, plus local studio Village Roadshow, cinema groups and distributors. No other rightsholders have more experience of blocking injunctions.
So-called ‘fully-loaded’ Android boxes were openly sold on eBay, Amazon, and other online platforms, while local markets, car boot sales, and dedicated retail units offered a same-day service. New Marketing Strategy Changed Nothing. This prompted a marketing review at DroidSticks.
1) Article L131-4 paragraph 1 of the French IntellectualProperty Code (‘IPC’) states the general applicable rule: the assignment by an author ‘ shall comprise a proportional participation by the author in the revenue from sale or exploitation of the work.’. and certain specific rules. royalties is proportional. To be continued….
In 2020, New Yorker Marketing & Media International GmbH (‘New Yorker’) filed invalidity applications against BIW’s trade marks, alleging that they lacked distinctiveness and were descriptive at the filing date ( Art. The Invalidity Division of the European Union IntellectualProperty Office (‘EUIPO’) rejected the applications.
2021-580 of 12 May 2021 (‘transposition Order’) of the French Government implements articles 2(6) and 17 to 23 of the EU Directive 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market (‘CDSM’). Image by Pexels from Pixabay Order no. It remains to be seen how future agreements will be negotiated.
According to the latest Cine en Cifras report by Proimágenes Colombia, 2023 was the year with the highest cinema attendance in history, reaching a figure of 50.39 La entrada Open call for audiovisual production se publicó primero en OlarteMoure | IntellectualProperty. million spectators. This represents an increase of 19.4%
For participation and attractiveness, data sources such as sites and landmarks; museums and galleries data; cinemas data, theaters, concerts, etc. local films and entertainment and media market. all from Google Earth , survey and desk review. Is the city tolerant of diversity?
Cinema Techs., Specifically, Dairy alleged that its “software includes and implements a methodology for handling [Federal Milk Marketing Order] pooling that is unique in the industry and is Dairy’s trade secret.” ” Id. at *2 (quoting Imax Corp. 3d 1161, 1164-65 (9th Cir. ” Id. ” Id.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative has just released its 2022 Special 301 Report detailing the state of intellectualproperty protection and enforcement by trading partners around the world. The 88-page report covers a broad range of intellectualproperty rights issues.
Topics discussed over lunch included the importance of Vietnam’s streaming market to the Hollywood studios, and “how to strengthen the bonds between our creative economies and protect the livelihoods of the creative workforce driving this shared growth.”
Madras High Court Inaugurates the IP Division and Notifies IntellectualProperty Division Rules, 2022 The Madras High Court on April 12, 2023, inaugurated the IntellectualProperty Rights (IPR) Division, making it the second High Court after the Delhi High Court with a dedicated IP Division to hear IPR disputes.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content