This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Police IntellectualProperty Crime Unit. Significant rightsholders facing challenges in the UK can seek help from the fraud specialists at the Police IntellectualProperty Crime Unit. Sources confirm that the copies were traced back to two multi-screen cinemas, both of them in Liverpool, the location mentioned by PIPCU.
IntellectualProperty, More Conflict Thus far, diminished access to various types of licensedintellectualproperty has prompted mostly unofficial responses in Russia. A current proposal envisages Russian cinemas legally screening foreign movies without rightsholders’ permission but with some kind of payment.
Apparently, many people are turning to piracy instead and even some local cinemas have followed suit. While clearly illegal, the chairman of the Russian Association of Cinema has sympathy for the plight of these struggling theater owners. These cinemas reportedly source their content from pirate sites. Copyright Groups Conerned.
In common with Russia, Belarus relies on intellectualproperty owned by foreign rightsholders that are currently unable or unwilling to supply and/or license it. So, to ensure legal access to pirated movies, music, TV shows and software, the government drafted a new law to restrict intellectualproperty rights.
Introduction The media and entertainment industry is a broad and ever-evolving domain that includes several industries, including music, cinema, television, fashion, and more. In this sector, intellectualproperty (IP) regulations are essential for defending the rights of inventors, artists, and producers.
Over the last 18 months, various ideas and proposals have leaned toward limiting or even nullifying Western entertainment companies’ intellectualproperty rights in response to their withdrawal from the Russian market. Federal Law No. 46-FZ The bill submitted in April seeks amendments to the provisions of Federal Law No.
When citizens first began screening pirated Hollywood movies in cinemas, Russian entertainment groups condemned them for it. Three months later, a dejected cinema industry chief said that he couldn’t blame venues for trying to stay alive. ” Russia Understands Value of IntellectualProperty.
On September 30, the day of the movie’s release, the Court published its orders, noting that substantial sums had been invested in ‘Vikram Vedha’ and the movie was expected to screen in 3,000 cinemas worldwide. How far he was prepared to go still came as a surprise. Overblocking Seems Unavoidable.
Article 18 of the CDSM provides that where authors license or transfer their exclusive rights for the exploitation of their works, they are ‘ entitled to receive appropriate and proportionate remuneration ’. More from our authors: Practical Guide to Successful IntellectualProperty Valuation and Transactions. To be continued….
“In terms of our client’s loss, our client’s film was originally planned to be released in cinemas in the first quarter of 2020. However, this is not a US court and there is absolutely no guarantee that the IntellectualProperty Enterprise Court’s Small Claims Track ( pdf ) would be interested in any of it.
SpicyIP Tidbits: Compulsory License on Mira Behn’s Autobiography, and Stricter Test of Similarity of Marks for Medicinal Products. Call for Papers: NALSAR’s Indian Journal of IntellectualProperty Law (IJIPL) Vol. Licensing Ip International S.AR.L Image from here. Call for Papers/ Submissions . Cases in Indian Courts.
Company B grants through websites (ie, music platforms) licences regarding any kind of use (eg, background music or in-store use, television use, cinema use, or radio use) for over 550,000 original musical works belonging to more than 7,300 rights holders around the world (eg, composers, performing artists, publishers and record companies).
As a result, new US-owned movies dried up, leaving the entire Russian cinema industry in crisis. Some venues began screening pirated movies downloaded from torrent sites but the move was criticized by local cinema groups who were saddened by a return to the unlicensed entertainment “dark days” of 30 years ago.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative has just released its 2022 Special 301 Report detailing the state of intellectualproperty protection and enforcement by trading partners around the world. The 88-page report covers a broad range of intellectualproperty rights issues.
Copyright is the cumulation of two words: “copy” and “right,” alternatively one may argue that copyright refers to the legal rights of the intellectualproperty’s real owner. According to Section 30, the holder of copyrights may license all or part of his rights to another party.
This will potentially impact the copyright licensing landscape insofar as filmmakers will have to enter into dedicated agreements to claim protection for works not listed within the scope of Section 17. Microsoft Technology Licensing v. the licensee. The judgement was authored by Justice C. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content