Remove Cease and Desist Remove Intellectual Property Remove Related Rights
article thumbnail

Austrian Supreme Court finds YouTube not responsible for copyright infringements by users

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The liability privilege therefore also applies to cease and desist claims, unless a prior warning letter was sent and the allegedly infringing content was not taken down quickly enough after a reasonable review. More from our authors: Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions.

article thumbnail

Copyright case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof 2015 – 2019 – Part 4 of 4: Copyright contract law and enforcement

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Injunctive relief (Section 97(1) UrhG) and cease and desist agreements. The BGH stated in 2018 that when interpreting (contractual) cease and desist agreements in cases of doubt cease and desist obligation must be interpreted as meaning that its effect has the same scope as the statutory claim for injunctive relief.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

The InfoSoc Directive and the Right to Repair: exploring the boundaries of a lesser-known copyright exception

Kluwer Copyright Blog

At least one medical device manufacturer took issue with the online library and sent iFixit a cease-and-desist letter, citing its exclusive rights under copyright to reproduce and communicate the repair information online. More from our authors: Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions.

Copyright 105
article thumbnail

Germany: Liability of hosting providers under copyright law if they have breached a duty of care – The German BGH ends mere ‘Stoererhaftung’

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Under German law, there are no special rules governing liability in cases of intellectual property rights infringements. Stoererhaftung’ merely provides for a cease and desist and removal obligation where a reasonable duty was breached. The resulting conclusion in the BGH case law (e.g., Swan € 112