Remove Cease and Desist Remove Document Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

Common Mistakes to Prevent When Filing for a Trademark

IP and Legal Filings

How to prevent: Keep track of the renewal deadlines and ensure that all the necessary documents are submitted on time or hire an attorney to keep track of the deadlines and file the same on your behalf. How to prevent: Seek help from a trademark attorney, who has a deep knowledge of Indian Trademark Laws.

article thumbnail

2023 IP Resolutions Start with a Review of IP Assets

The IP Law Blog

Unless a company executive is closely managing these vendors when they do their work, it would be difficult to determine whether or not they engaged in acts that may be considered infringement until the company receives a cease and desist letter.

IP 98
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trademark For Business Growth

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

To obtain trademark protection, a business must first adopt a graphically represented mark which is unique and distinguishable. Section 9(1) (c) of the Trademark Act, 1999 prohibits the registration of words used commonly. It takes years for them to get registration.

article thumbnail

Understanding the Contents of a Patent

LexBlog IP

What it contains: type of patent document – the type of patent document can inform stakeholders of whether the patent is a design, utility, or plant patent. patent number – the patent number can be used by stakeholders to identify the specific patent document. Rob’s Attorney Profile. Contact Rob.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 6- February 12)

SpicyIP

Can “honest concurrent use” be used as a defense against a trademark infringement claim? Lokesh, highlighting its history, argues that honest concurrent use is a principle of trademark law and is not limited to a provision. Delhi High Court Imposes Costs worth INR 2 Cr. on Triveni Interchem Pvt.

Designs 52
article thumbnail

Surprise! Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Bored Ape Yacht Club v. Ripps

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

.” Most of the opinion discusses the trademark implications of Ripps’ rival NFT collection. With that framing, trademark law protects against the unwanted competition, and the court treats this as an easy rightsowner win. Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v.

Fair Use 105
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (August 12-August 18)

SpicyIP

Read Yogesh Byadwal’s post explaining what the case is about and how the court interpreted “technical effect” Playing from a “Safe Distance”: Analysing the Rule, its Roots and Application in India Image by wirestock on Freepik What is the “Safe Distance” rule in trademark law and how does it apply?