This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As fear and anxiety proliferate during this pandemic, fraudulent or falseadvertisements also surge and explode. Petitioners raise falseadvertising claims and try to stop misleading advertisements by seeking injunctions.
Its buyers allegedly refused to continue doing business with it because it couldn’t fulfill its obligations to deliver the product, it suffered severe harm to its business reputation, and its pursuit of the media campaign was rendered a total loss, causing $90 million in damages (mostly lost sales). But see The Knit With v.
The LoanStreet court didn’t even go that far with the “educational leaflet service” trick; it simply said that gripers ads that could damage a business’ reputation constitute a use in commerce, even when there’s zero commercial activity. The post Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet
The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to falseadvertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” This argument has failed so many times. See, e.g., the cited Ynfante v. Google opinion. ” Cites to Perfect 10 v.
28, 2021) Mostly this case is about other things, but the court finds a duty to defend in the underlying falseadvertising case. Luxottica was sued in a class action alleging that its AccuFit system for prescription eyeglasses was falselyadvertised as more accurate.
19, 2024) Not a surprise, but fills a gap in the caselaw: employment ads arent commercial advertising and promotion for the business trying to hire. SND alleged that two job posts and the employee training in 2019 which involves the dissemination of false statements, constitute false commercial adverting.
6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that falseadvertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. But why would some advertising constitute exercising control while other advertising didn’t? In re Windstream Holdings, Inc.,
The parties used to have an ongoing business relationship in which both companies outsourced clients to each other and engaged in regular communications regarding their business operations. That didn’t amount to a “reasonable expectancy” of future business which was interfered with by Boston Suburban.
2, 2021) Rex sued Zillow and the National Association of Realtors for antitrust and falseadvertising violations. Surprisingly, the antitrust claims survive, as do falseadvertising claims agains Zillow. Zillow argued that its conduct was “reasonable in relation to the development and preservation of [its] business.”
Similarly, “ordinary business transactions” can satisfy the substantial assistance element of an aiding and abetting claim “if the [defendant] actually knew those transactions were assisting the [principal] in committing a specific tort.
Despite Romag , the court declines to award disgorgement or fees in this falseadvertising case. A jury found that Harbor Breeze proved all elements of liability for falseadvertising but awarded $0 in damages and profits. But here, evidence connecting falseadvertising to defendants’ profits was lacking. (Is
They allegedly wrongfully ousted Corkum and, when he asserted his rights, incorporated Oak City to continue the business, allegedly with LStar’s equipment, money, and intellectual property. Vining, 2021 WL 4344891, No. 5:20-CV-184-FL (E.D.N.C. Not every word on a label or ad is a mark. LStar didn’t plead its own trademark use.
The relief provided in the settlement (at least for those whose purchases are verifiable by Macy’s business records or who can provide proof of purchase) likely meets or exceeds what any class member could have procured by an individual lawsuit.” But fraud and unjust enrichment, along with UCC breach of warranty, did not create any conflicts.
Plaintiffs allegd both direct and contributory falseadvertising, which requires (1) that the “third party in fact directly engaged in falseadvertising that injured the plaintiff” and (2) “that the defendant contributed to that conduct either by knowingly inducing, or causing the conduct, or by materially participating in it.”
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. But Defendants have brought on themselves these unfortunate consequences through their falseadvertising.”
The First Amendment has long coexisted with no-fault falseadvertising laws. Content is typically commercial if it makes “representations of fact about the business operations, products, or services of the speaker (or the individual or company that the speaker represents). There was also no copyright preemption.
pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory falseadvertising. Defendants challenged whether plaintiffs identified any false or misleading statements by defendants. In Baldino’s Lock & Key Serv., Google, Inc., App’x 81 (4th Cir.
A Florida medical spa has settled a federal lawsuit with Houston-based rapper 50 Cent over a photo he took with its owner that was later allegedly used on social media to promote the business' services without his authorization.
25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of falseadvertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. It is enough if a defendant provides “a necessary product or service, without which the falseadvertising would not be possible.”
The claims are mostly the kind of trade secret/tortious interference claims you’d expect from this setup, and I won’t say much about them, but there is also a falseadvertising claim about alleged misrepresentations of distributors’ income with Melaleuca.
7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying falseadvertising claim. caused ExeGi to lose business.” The jury “awarded ExeGi $15 million in damages after Alfasigma falselyadvertised VSL#3 by referencing studies done on the De Simone Formulation,” and the district court found an intent to cause confusion.
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a falseadvertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/social media (consumers) and social advertising markets.
It has more than 400 commercial customers, including global enterprises such as Walmart, Comcast, Cisco, and eBay, and also does substantial business with government agencies, including US agencies. Summary judgment granted on state and federal falseadvertising claims. False designation of origin: Yep.
million consent judgment, which defendants touted in a press release and advertised on Zinus’s website even after the court vacated the stipulated judgment. Courts have generally harmonized the Lanham Act with the Patent Act by requiring bad faith before claims about patent infringement can constitute falseadvertising.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. As for her surveysone of home users and one of out-of-home users like office usersthe court also allowed them.
InterNACHI argued that ASHI’s tagline constituted Lanham Act falseadvertising because it portrays ASHI’s entire membership as being educated, tested, verified, and certified, even though its membership includes so-called “novice” inspectors who have yet to complete training or become certified.
Route Consultant is a consultancy business that serves ISPs, as well as another type of FedEx contractor—transportation service providers or TSPs, who provide long-distance transportation services as opposed to actual package delivery, which is done by ISPs. Together they are known as CSPs, contracted service providers.
OSD’s signal-to-noise statement was literally false because it advertised its amplifier as having 115 decibels on numerous websites even though OSD said in other statements under penalty of perjury that the signal-to-noise ratio was 104 decibels, and it didn’t submit test results or objective evidence that it was 115.
AB argued that its ad never mentioned or referenced Logistick, so it couldn’t interfere with Logistick’s business. Further, it argued, Logistick basically just recited the elements about future relationships and knowledge. Although that seems right to me, the court disagreed.
Following the Restatement of Conflicts, courts consider: “the place where the injury occurred; the place where the conduct causing the injury occurred; the domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business of the parties; and the place where the relationship, if any, between the parties is centered.”
Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview. Chapter 9: FalseAdvertising Practice and Remedies. Chapter 10: Other Business Torts. Chapter 4: Deception. Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter? Reasonable Consumers and Materiality. Chapter 6: Omissions and Disclosures.
17, 2020) A lot of stuff here; I will ignore the non-falseadvertising related aspects of this mostly antitrust case. The court says the usual not-good things about falseadvertising’s relationship to antitrust, unfortunately: Deceptive speech usually doesn’t violate antitrust laws. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ (D.
Injury: Damages and disgorgement under the Lanham Act require injury (for falseadvertising, not trademark infringement, despite the same statutory language covering both; no, I am not going to stop pointing this out any time soon). And economic analysis is a valid means of proving an injury caused by falseadvertising.
In addition, although expenses incurred in bringing the WCPA claim itself are not cognizable, “[i]nvestigation expenses and other costs resulting from a deceptive business practice sufficiently establish injury.”
This allegedly harmed Geomatrix’s business. A similar fate awaited other Michigan common-law business tort claims: business defamation/injurious falsehood, fraud/misrepresentation, and interference with prospective economic advantage. Standard 40 certification is not a “consumer” good or service.
and its leaders of violating several laws related to fraud, conspiracy, contract violations and falseadvertising by claiming he was wrongly told the company would remain a nonprofit, in a suit filed in California federal court. Elon Musk on Monday accused OpenAI Inc.
After filing 13 lawsuits in 2023 claiming trademark infringement, deceptive trade practices, and falseadvertising related to the pharmaceuticals Ozempic and Wegovy, Novo Nordisk—a 100-year-old pharmaceutical company with its origins in Denmark—is once again making headlines.
2, 2021) Allied, aka Republic, “provides waste and recycling services to business and residential customers in the Kansas City metropolitan area.” Republic alleged tortious interference, trespass/conversion, and falseadvertising claims. Allied Servs., Smash My Trash, LLC, 2021 WL 3354839, No. 21-cv-00249-SRB (W.D.
WNI and AST sell directly to consumers, while Specialty is a wholesaler that sells to other businesses, including AST. Relevant background: more than 20 years ago, WNI purchased an enzyme blend in bulk from Specialty; it got sued for falselyadvertising a product sourced from as containing enteric coated serrapeptase.
One way to succeed in business is to build a better mousetrap. An alternative is to get a movie star or an All Black to make an ad telling the world that your mousetrap is totally awesome. By: Dentons
30, 2022) Pegasystems alleged that defendants, which compete with it in the business process management (BPM) software field, engaged in falseadvertising and commercial disparagement in an online report that portrayed Pegasystems unfavorably. So Appian got summary judgment on Pegasystems’ claim money damages for lost business.
The court found that, based on text, legislative history, caselaw, and general anti-spam principles, “false or misleading information” meant false or misleading information about the commercial nature of the email, with the legislative history using examples like “hi There!”, “Information Request” and “Your Business Records.”
A company that places senior citizens in retirement homes was hit with proposed class claims alleging it falselyadvertises free services and steers business away from communities that decline to participate in its "pay-to-play" business model.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content