False advertising about a bankrupt competitor doesn't violate the automatic stay
43(B)log
DECEMBER 12, 2022
6, 2022) The district court reverses the bankruptcy court ruling ( discussed here ) that held that false advertising had interfered with the debtor’s estate in violation of the automatic stay. But why would some advertising constitute exercising control while other advertising didn’t? In re Windstream Holdings, Inc.,
Let's personalize your content