This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A SocialMedia Influencer is someone who creates unique material that keeps people interested on multiple socialmedia platforms, causing them to return for more high-quality information. One of the most significant methods to safeguard material on socialmedia is through copyright.
30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. 1, 2017 to Apr. 11, 2023 (claiming that various products were “patented”).
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on socialmedia, including videos on her TikTok account. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.
Atari asserted that State Farm’s ad damaged its brand by showing the company’s khaki-clad spokesperson “Jake from State Farm” smacking the machine to get it working—implying that Atari’s products were unreliable and outdated. A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy.
A couple of specifics: The falseadvertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falselyadvertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” Despite Doe v. Case citation : Bride v.
28, 2022) Chanel sued What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), alleging trademark infringement, falseadvertising, false association/endorsement, and related NY GBL claims for deceptive/unfair trade practices and falseadvertising. Until 2017, it also used the hashtag #WGACACHANEL in its socialmedia posts.
This has led to consumers opting for brands that pledge their duty to contributing towards environmental protection by means of minimalism and sustainability. In today’s era of eco-branding, wherein trademarks are used to distinguish sustainable brands from the mainstream commercial ones, the latter engage in the practise of “greenwashing”.
Using the name or image of a celebrity for brandadvertisement or promotion in the US does not always attract liability, provided the brand is not falsely misleading the public that the celebrity endorses the product. Spelling-Goldberg Prods., In Gautam Gambhir v. D.A.P & Co. &
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.
Nike claims that, despite those efforts, StockX sold a number of Nike-branded shoes that were counterfeits. As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in falseadvertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.” Surely a highly negative control is not a very plausible ad.)
Despite the uncertainty around the long-term success of NFTs, we have certainly seen a “land grab” from brands filing trade marks, including ITV (for LOVE ISLAND), Heineken and even The Empire State Building [Katpost with details from Becky Knott here ].
Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various socialmedia platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered socialmedia influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
As such, the ESG Report promotes Defendant’s products and its brand more generally.” Whatever the initial motivation, “the subsequent promotion of the ESG Report to Defendant’s socialmedia followers supports the conclusion that the ESG Report was used to target Defendant’s actual and potential customers.”
Purlife Brands, Inc., 21, 2023) In two opinions on the same day, the court dealt with various IP/falseadvertising claims brought by one litter box seller against another. Motion to dismiss denied as to trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition claims based on the use of Smarty Pear’s hashtags.
4, 2022) Mosafer, a travel business that “aligns its branding with the State of Qatar,” sued several defendants for making public statements allegedly disparaging the State of Qatar and harming the Mosafer parties’ brand, which is closely aligned with the country.
May 19, 2023) Whereas the timeshare falseadvertising cases might be making law largely applicable to other timeshare cases, what’s going on in the strip club advertising cases might have somewhat broader implications. The district court concluded that plaintiffs’ false endorsement claims were foreclosed by Electra v.
Damages experts: The court began with a statement that a Lanham Act [falseadvertising] plaintiff must prove causation to get damages. test/control stimuli His survey population differed somewhat as did the control group/questions. Ultimately, the flaws in the materiality survey were too great for admissibility.
Painaway advertised its products as “Australia’s No. 1 Joint & Muscle Spray and Cream Topical Pain Relief Brand” on: (1) its Australian website; (2) socialmedia; and (3) Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) athletes’ clothing in matches televised in the United States.
Kaira’s brand AMUL is internationally renowned and India’s largest food brand. First, Kaira provided evidence of the goodwill that the AMUL brand and designs have acquired globally and in Canada. Kaira produces milk products. Kaira is based in India, has been in operation since 1946 and has over 3.2
American Girl Brands, LLC, 2021 WL 510729, No. Walkowicz allegedly received multiple emails and social-media messages commenting on the similarities between Walkowicz and Luciana and inquiries about whether they had endorsed the doll. Not to mention that “dilution” is not the same thing as false endorsement! Walkowicz v.
Also, whether “handcrafted” may be deceptive in a particular case depends, at least in part, on the size of the brand holding its products out as “handcrafted,” and plaintiffs sufficiently alleged that Blue Ice was not a mass seller, so reasonable consumers could believe it “handcrafted” its vodka.
So too w/falseadvertising. Assumptions skipped over in TM/falseadvertising analysis.] Protecting brand investment and consumers? Keep up with the culture by considering socialmedia. Evolving norms of communication and branding both have no punctuation/capitalization: lululemon.
A variant of separating the mark from the brand; not seeing it in all categories, and we may have a world in which some marks—maybe the 1%--are not divided from brands but the others are. Brands can choose to “gate” on Amazon with authorization letters, but how does the consumer know the seller will stick to selling genuine goods?
An online article used photos of the Lounge in its coverage of the series, and MGFB also submitted socialmedia posts. Plaintiffs’ socialmedia expert opined that the show meant that Internet searches for “Florabama” or “Flora-Bama” led to “blurred” results filled with MTV Floribama Shore content.
This rejection order passed consequent to a pre-grant opposition was among the many other legal and social campaigns against the high prices at which the drug was made available. Doing this was regarded as essential to avoid stifling local industry and balance global brand reputation with the interests of national enterprises and consumers.
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. The court rejected Axon’s argument that LHB could have identified its products by calling them CEWs; they were Taser brand products.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on socialmedia. For example, it alleges that 12 posters are responsible for two thirds of the anti-vax content on socialmedia. Are the reports advertisements?
Introduction Well, the online space is indeed centuries apart from any business process for creating a brand and speaking with its audience; now everything can even protect its intellectual property. This is where trademarks truly reflect as a brand identity and shape a very rapid recognition. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
Socialmedia influencers seem reasonably held liable, but what about when the seller is texting friends. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law. We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law.
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising. This a Tom Sachs painting from his recent series of brand paintings. American Girl Brands, LLC, 2021 WL 510729, No.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Court can’t seem to figure out how to handle that duality between pure information and brand value.
Ultimately, the California enforcers reached a financial settlement with the clothing brand that includes injunctive terms governing future conduct. 4: Early Opioid Medication Litigation Rulings Favor Advertisers. We expect state AGs to continue to scrutinize the effects of advertising and media, including socialmedia, on minors.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content