This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In December 2020, Deetsch notified Amazon of his patents through the Brand Registry portal and asked Amazon to remove the Lei defendants’ products. He sent two letters by mail in March 2022, but was told he needed to use the Brand Registry … which he had already done. Motion to dismiss granted. State law claims would have been better.)
22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
I won’t say much about that, though I do have a big question, but there are also falseadvertising aspects of the case. Falseadvertising: the jury found for Select Comfort on seven falseadvertising claims and for defendants on the remaining eight, awarding about $160,000 in disgorgement and nothing on lost profits.
A company that sells fertilizer to commercial cannabis growers has claimed a competitor used its trademarks as part of an unsanctioned co-branding campaign and on THC lab testing reports that falselyadvertise its products as less effective, according to a suit filed in Washington federal court.
14, 2023) Unlimited, an “online non-authorized reseller of consumer products,” sued Red Points for defamation, tortious interference, and falseadvertising under state and federal law. As you might expect from these preliminaries, Red Points reported two of Unlimited’s listings on eBay as infringing and counterfeit.
1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the falseadvertising claims with prejudice.
Plaintiffs alleged that these ads were false and misleading because there was no scientific evidence supporting the claim that GSG reduced the risk of developing certain allergies or atopic dermatitis. 2) A print magazine advertisement described GSG as the “1st Formula with FDA qualified health claim.” (3)
Nike claims that, despite those efforts, StockX sold a number of Nike-branded shoes that were counterfeits. Butler found that there was no statistically significant difference in cells’ self-reported likelihood of purchasing shoes on StockX, suggesting lack of materiality. Nike’s criticisms warranted cross-examination, not exclusion.
Codefendant Lienau allegedly assists clients with removing fraudulent products from Amazon’s website, and reported CDC to Amazon for selling counterfeits. It alleged that Lienau filed the reports for anticompetitive reasons after defendants suspected or confirmed the products were genuine.
Despite the uncertainty around the long-term success of NFTs, we have certainly seen a “land grab” from brands filing trade marks, including ITV (for LOVE ISLAND), Heineken and even The Empire State Building [Katpost with details from Becky Knott here ].
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.
May 25, 2022) Alcon sued Lens.com for federal and state falseadvertising and trademark claims. The Lanham Act falseadvertising counterclaim was dismissed. Alcon Vision, LLC v. Lens.com, Inc., 2022 WL 1665453, No. 1:18-cv-00407-NG-RLM (E.D.N.Y. This is hard to show.
24, 2021) Plaintiffs sought class certification of their falseadvertising claims based on the claims that KIND falselyadvertised “All Natural / Non-GMO,” “Non-GMO,” and “No Genetically Engineered Ingredients”; KIND sought to exclude expert reports. In re KIND LLC “Healthy and All Natural” Litig.,
5, 2023) Hicks alleged that defendant, a California agricultural corporation, misrepresented the environmental impact of its farming practices through its advertising and “Inaugural Report on Environmental, Social and Governance Actions.” The court found that the commercial speech exception applied to the ESG report.
lululemon’s brand also displays prominently in its keyword ads. For more on this, see my expert report in the Larsen v. McNeil. * Three Keyword Advertising Decisions in a Week, and the Trademark Owners Lost Them All. * Competitor Gets Pyrrhic Victory in FalseAdvertising Suit Over Search Ads–Harbor Breeze v.
9, 2023) Simpson sued MiTek for Lanham Act and state law falseadvertising/passing off, and for copyright infringement. Based on this label, do you believe that MiTek’s ADTT-TZ product has the same attributes, such as load capacity, number of required fasteners, and existence of code reports, as the DTT1Z product?
2024) The court of appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of KIND on Bustamante’s falseadvertising consumer protection class action claims based on KIND’s “All Natural” labeling. Bustamante v. KIND, LLC, 100 F.4th 4th 419 (2d Cir. Without the expert evidence, summary judgment for KIND was appropriate.
The revised perception survey involved presenting to respondents an un-branded ice cream product that displayed only the Vanilla Representations on the front label of the product. of respondents reported that they believed that “all of the vanilla flavor” comes from the vanilla plant; 16.6% were not sure.
4, 2022) Mosafer, a travel business that “aligns its branding with the State of Qatar,” sued several defendants for making public statements allegedly disparaging the State of Qatar and harming the Mosafer parties’ brand, which is closely aligned with the country.
The control group was shown a “workup” of what a “Plaid branding only” user interface would look like. He explained the internal testing in his expert report, with detailed descriptions, and he applied scientific principles to the data, including in his visualizations. There were limited interactive elements on the screens.
Plaid allegedly then presented PNC consumers who were trying to connect to fintech apps via Plaid Link with messaging screens, using allegedly confusing branding, that said, “we’re currently experiencing connectivity issues with this bank” and “PNC has made a change that prevents you from being able to link your accounts.”
Plaintiffs sued for falseadvertising and false endorsement under the Lanham Act, violation of their right to publicity, deceptive trade practices under New York GBL Section 349, and defamation. 2021), which considered all these claims except for falseadvertising. And their expert report was not good.
Enigma sued its competitor Malwarebytes for Lanham Act falseadvertising and NY business torts for designating its products as “malicious,” “threats,” and “potentially unwanted programs” (PUPs). In addition, “judges are not experts in the cybersecurity field.… In addition, “judges are not experts in the cybersecurity field.…
No other elderberry brand can make the same claim”; “Developed by a world renowned virologist, Sambucol® has been trusted by millions worldwide. reported some health-related benefit, with 33.9% Sambucol can be taken every day for continuous immune support.” times more likely to perceive the surveyed health benefits (51.9% Only 71.2%
Compared to the ‘rigorous’ approval process for prescription-drug labels, the TTB process ‘hinges on self reporting’ and reflects only the representations made to it by the distributor, not an endorsement of those claims.” The court also found fraud adequately pled, including for the statutory claims.
but also narrows the issues somewhat; the larger infringement, cybersquatting, and falseadvertising claims can’t be resolved on summary judgment. The court rejected Axon’s argument that LHB could have identified its products by calling them CEWs; they were Taser brand products. I might’ve gone the other way on this.]
The Center for Countering Digital Hate is a not for profit organization that publishes reports on among other things, hate speech and disinformation on social media. CCDH urges brands to not advertise on sites that promote disinformation. X Corp suggests that these efforts have resulted in reduced advertising levels on Twitter.
Trademark infringement through misleading use of logos or branding: Dark patterns might involve the deceptive use of logos, brand names, or trademarks to mislead users into making purchases or signing up for services they didn’t intend to. This violates copyright laws and may lead to legal actions for copyright infringement.
Typically, a consumer survey would be introduced through an expert report, well after filing the complaint. Bye, Goff * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet LoanStreet v. Reyes & Adler v.
VIP Products, Jack Daniel’s, the maker of the popular whiskey brand, filed a lawsuit against VIP Products, a company that sells a dog toy shaped like a whiskey barrel. Jack Daniel’s argued that the toy infringed on their trademark, as the shape of the whiskey [bottle] is closely associated with their brand. ” Id.
The third category lists notable developments on the legislative and policy side and includes important amendments, proposals for amendments, release of policy notes and reports etc. So, if you have strong opinions on orders/judgements that you think should’ve been included in the top 10 lists, please do share them in the comments below!
DIY Premium allows reporting of investment or rental income. Steckel concluded that Blocks conduct, which resulted in the perception of an equal or superior product at a lower price, could cause negative feelings regarding the pricing of TurboTax products and harm the TurboTax brand. Were in a world where thats enough, I guess.)
Introduction Well, the online space is indeed centuries apart from any business process for creating a brand and speaking with its audience; now everything can even protect its intellectual property. This is where trademarks truly reflect as a brand identity and shape a very rapid recognition. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
Since 2014, 80% of cases reported to the FDA (triggering the investigation) came from two vets affiliated with Hill’s. Allegedly because of the biased reporting, in 2018 the FDA issued a warning about repots of DCM in dogs “eating certain pet foods containing peas, lentils, other legume seeds, or potatoes as main ingredients.”
People are notoriously bad at reporting on their own mental processes and that’s what we’re asking them to do. Heymann: but actually ask them to perform the selection task, not just report on what they think they’d do. Heymann: efficiency/cost trades off with accuracy in surveys. especially with “why do you say that?”
An email announcement sent to a cultivated list of industry professionals, including wine vendors, chefs and restaurant owners stated, in relevant part: The Gordon Companies is thrilled to announce that we have partnered with White Elephant Resorts to present the newly branded Nantucket Food And Wine Experience.
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising. This a Tom Sachs painting from his recent series of brand paintings. American Girl Brands, LLC, 2021 WL 510729, No.
Ultimately, the California enforcers reached a financial settlement with the clothing brand that includes injunctive terms governing future conduct. 4: Early Opioid Medication Litigation Rulings Favor Advertisers. California has also launched an online tool for consumers to efficiently report potential violations. Takeaway No.
Malwarebytes, which allowed a falseadvertising claim to proceed based on one software provider’s use of the terms “malicious” and “threat” to describe its alleged competitor’s software, despite a dissent raising free speech arguments. Court can’t seem to figure out how to handle that duality between pure information and brand value.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content