JD Supra Law

SEPTEMBER 16, 2024

Fiskars Finland OY AB and Fiskars Brands Inc. and its affiliated parties (“Woodland”), asserting design patent infringement, false advertising, trade secret. collectively, “Fiskars”) sued Woodland Tools Inc. By: Irwin IP LLP

Design Patent 63

Design Patent Patent Infringement False Advertising Designs 63

43(B)log

OCTOBER 18, 2024

Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and false advertising claims survived. And they allegedly copied golf courses created on Perfect Golf’s course design platform. In addition, defendants allegedly claimed that course selection included “iconic, branded courses like St. 3d 1137 (9th Cir.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Contracts Advertising Advertising 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

TaylorMade Golf Company teed off a dispute over golf club design and filed a patent infringement lawsuit on January 31 st, 2024, in the Southern District of California against Costco and Southern California Design Company alleging infringement and false advertising relating to five of TaylorMade’s patents related to golf irons.

False Advertising 102

False Advertising Invention Advertising Advertising 102

43(B)log

JANUARY 27, 2023

24, 2023) WS sued Wayfair, alleging patent infringement, Lanham Act false advertising, Massachusetts and California statutory unfair competition and Massachusetts false advertising based on alleged copying of West Elm products. Wayfair moved to dismiss the false advertising and unfair competition claims.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 59

43(B)log

APRIL 17, 2023

Quincy sued BRYK “under multiple legal theories for making unauthorized sales of products branded with Quincy’s PREVAGEN trademark.” 13, 2023) I don’t usually blog default cases because there’s usually little legal analysis; this case is an exception around the fraught area of first sale, showing unusual diligence by the court.

False Advertising 45

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 45

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 9, 2022

The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). False Advertising. This lawsuit relates to the “Toast Plus” app that was available in Apple’s app store. ” Section 230. eBay case from 2008.

False Advertising 143

False Advertising Privacy Publishing Advertising 143

IPilogue

JUNE 21, 2022

sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. Nike claimed trademark dilution, pointing to StockX’s heavy use of trademarks in attracting consumers familiar with the Nike brand. On February 3 rd 2022 Nike Inc. StockX Vault NFTs.

Non-Fungible Tokens 116

Non-Fungible Tokens Ownership False Advertising Fair Use 116

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 4, 2022

False advertising: Plaintiffs didn’t allege that Nobelle altered the merchandise in any way; “instead, the false statement arises from implication, from the fact that Nobelle is selling products that are not theirs to sell and, in the case of ‘The Line’ items, products it does not have the authority to sell.”

False Advertising 64

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 64

43(B)log

MAY 19, 2023

WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on social media, including videos on her TikTok account.

Copying 94

Copying False Advertising Social Media Advertising 94

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 14, 2022

. (“Chanel”), is an iconic fashion company based in New York known for its luxury fashion products and owns rights to several Chanel and CC monograms trademarks associated with the brand design. The brand was not involved with selling secondly handed or vintage goods. Veronique Idea Corp., 2d 262, 267 (S.D.N.Y.

Branding 52

Branding Branding Brands False Advertising 52

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 20, 2024

18, 2024) Scotts makes consumer lawn, garden, pesticide, and insecticide products, including under the “ORTHO” brand. Scotts alleged rights in its red mark, black trade dress, black label, and yellow barrier design that were allegedly infringed by competitor SBM’s competing products. SBM Life Science Corp.,

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Copyright Advertising Advertising 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 19, 2023

Despite the rhetorical moves to position the lawsuit about the defendants’ design choices, this is actually an easy case. Internet Brands , 230 applies to the failure-to-warn claims because “Plaintiffs’ theory would require the editing of third-party content, thus treating Defendants as a publisher of content.”

False Advertising 105

False Advertising Social Media Publishing Advertising 105

43(B)log

OCTOBER 18, 2024

At the core, plaintiff alleged that defendant MGDH’s use of phrasing and imagery suggesting that Meadow Gold brand products are sourced in Hawai’i was misleading and deceptive because Meadow Gold products contain milk and other products, such as whipping cream, imported from the continental United States. the origin. the origin.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 59

43(B)log

MARCH 14, 2024

11, 2024) I have a long-running interest in Rule 68 offers of judgment, and this case involves an interaction with false advertising law! We are fiercely protective of the Crocs brand and our iconic DNA. Crocs, Inc., 2024 WL 1051951No. 23-cv-01790-PAB-KAS (D. The parties compete in the shoe market.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Branding 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 5, 2021

Lanham Act False Advertising. Enigma claimed it was false for Malwarebytes to call its programs “malicious,” “threats,” and PUPs. Malwarebytes , the court held that such labels were subjective opinions, not verifiably false. Internet Brands. In Asurvio v.

Blogging 145

Blogging False Advertising Law Advertising 145

43(B)log

DECEMBER 23, 2021

12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary false advertising analysis. RectorSeal also sells a product known as the Metacaulk Box Guard.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 59

43(B)log

MARCH 6, 2024

1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and false advertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the false advertising claims with prejudice.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Reporting 59

43(B)log

APRIL 15, 2024

GMP owns two federally registered trademarks: the “GOOD MEAT” standard character mark and the “GOOD MEAT BREAKDOWN” design mark. The court denies a preliminary injunction on the trademark claims based on lack of likely success on the merits, but declines to dismiss either infringement or false advertising claims.

False Advertising 64

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Marketing 64

43(B)log

JULY 15, 2024

Nike claims that, despite those efforts, StockX sold a number of Nike-branded shoes that were counterfeits. As for the positivity of the ads, “consumer surveys in false advertising cases commonly display the challenged advertisement.” Surely a highly negative control is not a very plausible ad.)

False Advertising 69

False Advertising Branding Brands Branding 69

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 20, 2024

Introduction Well, the online space is indeed centuries apart from any business process for creating a brand and speaking with its audience; now everything can even protect its intellectual property. This is where trademarks truly reflect as a brand identity and shape a very rapid recognition. It has also brought a lot of challenges.

Social Media 59

Social Media Trademark Branding Branding 59

43(B)log

JANUARY 27, 2023

False advertising: Spiralverse allegedly falsely advertised its version of the Piano Book on Amazon as “new,” despite the rebinding, residue, and front labels. Was this literally false? But ruling on that was premature before discovery.

Derivative Work 75

Derivative Work False Advertising Advertising Advertising 75

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 3, 2024

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.

False Advertising 49

False Advertising Contracts Branding Brands 49

43(B)log

JULY 3, 2023

Industria, based on Colombia, produces and distributes food products under two relevant brand names: Zenú and Ranchera. They’re successful brands: approximately $300,000,000 annually in sales of Zenú products and $100,000,000 in sales of Ranchera products. T]he one showed in the application is not mine.”

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Registration 59

43(B)log

DECEMBER 28, 2022

17, 2022) Along with the headline-worthy nature of the claim (“ITALY’S #1 BRAND OF PASTA” plausibly falsely communicates Italian origin), the decision contains an extended discussion of judicial notice on a motion to dismiss v. Could “ITALY’S #1 BRAND OF PASTA” mislead reasonable consumers?

Branding 45

Branding Branding Brands False Advertising 45

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

Wakefern operates approximately 353 supermarkets under various brands such as ShopRite and Fairway Market across several states, and has a registration for ShopRite. False advertising: Not commercial advertising or promotion. Trademark infringement: This just wasn’t use in commerce.

False Advertising 45

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Marketing 45

43(B)log

AUGUST 27, 2021

30, 2021) Dynatemp and another company sued defendants for false advertising and related claims; defendant RMS counterclaimed similarly. Notable holdings: RMS didn’t plausibly allege that plaintiffs falsely designated their goods. It contains a different lubricant that we believe you will find works even better.”

False Advertising 45

False Advertising Branding Brands Branding 45

43(B)log

MARCH 27, 2023

9, 2023) Hernandez brought the usual California claims against RSC for allegedly false and misleading advertising of its electric collar products for pets under the brand name PetSafe. It is designed to get your pet’s attention, but not punish him. This method has been proven safe and will not harm your pet.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Branding 59

43(B)log

JUNE 14, 2022

May 25, 2022) Alcon sued Lens.com for federal and state false advertising and trademark claims. 1994), “before considering consumer survey evidence, a district court must, first, determine whether the designation of geographic origin is ‘geographically descriptive.’ The Lanham Act false advertising counterclaim was dismissed.

False Advertising 72

False Advertising Trademark Advertising Advertising 72

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MARCH 13, 2022

Las Vegas Skydiving Adventures offers tandem skydiving under the “Fyrosity” brand. Melwani sells products under the “Royal Silk” brand. ” The false designation of origin claim is similarly governed by the Ninth Circuit’s Lasoff v. More Posts About Keyword Advertising.

Trademark 110

Trademark Advertising Advertising Settlement 110

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 14, 2022

. (“Chanel”), is an iconic fashion company based in New York known for its luxury fashion products and owns rights to several Chanel and CC monograms trademarks associated with the brand design. The brand was not involved with selling second handed or vintage goods. Veronique Idea Corp., 2d 262, 267 (S.D.N.Y.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Branding Branding Brands 52

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s false advertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the false advertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Social Media 59

43(B)log

MARCH 13, 2023

The revised perception survey involved presenting to respondents an un-branded ice cream product that displayed only the Vanilla Representations on the front label of the product. of respondents reported that they believed that “all of the vanilla flavor” comes from the vanilla plant; 16.6% were not sure.

False Advertising 56

False Advertising Branding Brands Branding 56

Copyright Lately

SEPTEMBER 29, 2024

In addition to copyright infringement, Atari brought claims for business disparagement, false information and advertising, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. Effect on the market : Atari alleged that it has an active licensing business extending its brand into advertising, merchandising, and other areas.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Copyright Artwork Social Media 98

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

MARCH 7, 2023

for trademark infringement, false advertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Contracts Advertising Advertising 52

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

and [the] Coach” brand. and [the] Coach” brand. Tapestry, Inc. Chunma USA, Inc., 2021 WL 1534988, No. 20-CV-0271 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. The complaint did “narrowly” state a claim. The complaint also showed images showing close similarities between Coach’s trademarks and some of Chunma’s products.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Registration Trademark Registering Trademarks 59

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

.” The agency stated in a press release that “boosting your products by hijacking another product’s ratings or reviews is a relatively new tactic, but is still plain old false advertising.” And giving brands a chance to react? ” And it cost Nature’s Bounty $600,000. Let’s unpack this.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Branding Brands Branding 52

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

While Illinois Tool sat on its hands, not only did J-B Weld’s sales grow, but it expanded its brands into more stores and launched new variants (like “Perma-Lock Green”). False advertising claims as to “Made in USA”: First, J-B Weld argued that Illinois Tool lacked standing because it didn’t advertise its own products as being “Made in USA.”

False Advertising 69

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Trademark 69