This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
Other defendants manufactured and sold the Cube with their unique branding through Kitchen Cube’s affiliate program. Kitchen Cube cube Leszczynski sued for (1) copyright infringement; (2) violation of Creative Commons license terms; and (3) falseadvertising and misrepresentation. The breach of contract claim survived.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. brewer works only with Keurig brand or licensed pods) but some did not (e.g., I prefer the taste of Keurig or Keurig-licensed brands.).
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. eBay case from 2008. Implications.
WowWee’s Vice President of Brand Development & Creative Strategy, Sydney Wiseman, used her WowWee email address to create a Roblox user account and used her Roblox account to promote My Avastars dolls on social media, including videos on her TikTok account.
Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. Certain claims sounding in contract or tort may be beyond the reach of Section 230(c)(2)’s protection from suit. See, e.g., E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc. , 3d 1265 (M.D. eBay, Inc. ,
Falseadvertising: Plaintiffs didn’t allege that Nobelle altered the merchandise in any way; “instead, the false statement arises from implication, from the fact that Nobelle is selling products that are not theirs to sell and, in the case of ‘The Line’ items, products it does not have the authority to sell.”
Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. There have also been complaints where creators have tried to NFT their own creativity but by doing so have breached a contract.
People in the industry use subscription pharmaceutical drug information databases to fulfill prescriptions and determine whether generic substitutes are available for brand named products. As to the email threads, the presence of the word “generic” in an email thread didn’t “transform an otherwise innocuous email into falseadvertising.”
for trademark infringement, falseadvertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the falseadvertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 17218077, No.
Enigma sued its competitor Malwarebytes for Lanham Act falseadvertising and NY business torts for designating its products as “malicious,” “threats,” and “potentially unwanted programs” (PUPs). Enigma alleged that its software products “(i) detect and remove malicious software (i.e.,
It also allegedly “selected the design and colors to help with brand identification; the purple, for example, complements Overjet’s purple brand color.” Online advertising and presentations during trade shows appear to be a starting point for potential purchases, but do not alone drive such decisions. Overjet, Inc.
In today’s market, a distinct brand identity is critical in all company sectors. Influencers that make a lot of money from internet marketing must also defend their own brand identification. Maintain your distinct brand identity. . Falseadvertising should be avoided when defaming a product. Trademarks.
Shenzhen allegedly placed orders without paying for them to “lock up” Drone Whirl’s gnome inventory; bribed Shenzhen’s customers to submit bad reviews of Drone Whirl’s products; and distributed pamphlets to its customers containing false or misleading statements about Drone Whirl’s products.
The breach of warranty claims were properly dismissed because MacNaughton failed to allege proper notice and privity of contract. Yet, if the company falselyadvertised that you could ‘blow a bubble bigger than your own head,’ it is plausible that a reasonable buyer could be misled.”
The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.
They sued for violations of Washington’s Consumer Protection Act, breach of contract, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty. They alleged that, had they known Solimo’s true melatonin dosage, they would not have purchased it at any price. The court denied Amazon’s motion to dismiss.
Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & FalseAdvertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and falseadvertising cases? Falseadvertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.
CCDH urges brands to not advertise on sites that promote disinformation. X Corp suggests that these efforts have resulted in reduced advertising levels on Twitter. Brandwatch, obtains data from Twitter under a contract, and then offers various tools to analyze its database. Are the reports advertisements?
Introduction Well, the online space is indeed centuries apart from any business process for creating a brand and speaking with its audience; now everything can even protect its intellectual property. This is where trademarks truly reflect as a brand identity and shape a very rapid recognition. It has also brought a lot of challenges.
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising. 30, 2021) Plaintiff Daniel Abrahams formerly contracted with a publisher to author a series related to the Fair Labor Standards Act.
An email announcement sent to a cultivated list of industry professionals, including wine vendors, chefs and restaurant owners stated, in relevant part: The Gordon Companies is thrilled to announce that we have partnered with White Elephant Resorts to present the newly branded Nantucket Food And Wine Experience.
Interested in sellers’ understanding of the contracts. Lemley: is/should there be contributory falseadvertising liability? We don’t need to reform advertising law; we need to reform agency law. Lemley: similarly it’s been proposed that liability should follow the brand, e.g. for franchising. Interviews/surveys?
Healthvana sued in May 2020 for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising in violation of both federal and state law, as well for cybersquatting under ACPA. Several hundred thousand bottles of hand sanitizer, however, had already been produced with the older, ‘Healthvana’ label. Telebrands won summary judgment.
Businesses harm consumers only in a few ways—falseadvertising, monopoly prices, defective products. RT: Counterargument: The price differential with the strong brand is empirically robust over decades because of the consumer preference for national brands. Amazon may also be able to redefine information by contract.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content