Brands Confidentiality Contracts Settlement 
TorrentFreak
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
A settlement proposal included a clause that Tusa couldn’t launch or be involved with any similar services. While Area 51 was shut down before the proposed settlement was signed, the plaintiffs claim that Tusa then launched a clone service called SingularityMedia which took on Area 51’s customers. Breach of Contract.
Intepat
JUNE 19, 2023
Therefore, it is important to make sure such confidential information is not publicised unauthorisedly. Therefore, it is prudent to sign NDAs in an effort to guarantee that any shared confidential information is not to be disclosed or used for purposes other than such negotiations by either party. The ownership is not transferred.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
JULY 11, 2022
The Bombay High Court ruled that the arbitration clause in the contract is lawful in response to this. Lectro E- Mobility Private Limited because the plaintiffs were seeking to defend their brand rights against a certain group rather than the entire world. In EuroKids International Private Limited v. EuroKids International Pvt.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
FEBRUARY 4, 2021
No earlier than July 31, 2023 per settlement. No earlier than November 20, 2023 per settlement. . No earlier than June 30, 2023 per settlement. No earlier than September 30, 2023 per settlement. No earlier than July 1, 2023 per settlement. No earlier than January 31, 2023 per settlement. January 2021.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
140 
Let's personalize your content