Remove Branding Remove False Advertising Remove Reporting
article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

In December 2020, Deetsch notified Amazon of his patents through the Brand Registry portal and asked Amazon to remove the Lei defendants’ products. He sent two letters by mail in March 2022, but was told he needed to use the Brand Registry … which he had already done. Motion to dismiss granted. State law claims would have been better.)

article thumbnail

antitrust claim against Suboxone, including false advertising, survives summary judgment

43(B)log

22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to false advertising difficult.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

IIC decision also says some things about false advertising: materiality may not be presumed from literal falsity

43(B)log

I won’t say much about that, though I do have a big question, but there are also false advertising aspects of the case. False advertising: the jury found for Select Comfort on seven false advertising claims and for defendants on the remaining eight, awarding about $160,000 in disgorgement and nothing on lost profits.

article thumbnail

Cannabis Fertilizer Co. Says Rival Stole IP For Fake THC Study

IP Law 360

A company that sells fertilizer to commercial cannabis growers has claimed a competitor used its trademarks as part of an unsanctioned co-branding campaign and on THC lab testing reports that falsely advertise its products as less effective, according to a suit filed in Washington federal court.

article thumbnail

Target of TM takedown notices has Lanham Act standing to challenge automated notice provider's ads claiming accuracy

43(B)log

14, 2023) Unlimited, an “online non-authorized reseller of consumer products,” sued Red Points for defamation, tortious interference, and false advertising under state and federal law. As you might expect from these preliminaries, Red Points reported two of Unlimited’s listings on eBay as infringing and counterfeit.

article thumbnail

Two hospitals can both be best, and use purple ads (for now at least)

43(B)log

1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and false advertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the false advertising claims with prejudice.

article thumbnail

Gerber's Good Start troubles continue

43(B)log

Plaintiffs alleged that these ads were false and misleading because there was no scientific evidence supporting the claim that GSG reduced the risk of developing certain allergies or atopic dermatitis. 2) A print magazine advertisement described GSG as the “1st Formula with FDA qualified health claim.” (3)