Book Derivative Work Ownership Public Domain 
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 25, 2023
Material that is in the public domain. Think of human modifications to AI as a quasi-derivative work—the copyright in a derivative work only extends to the material contributed by the author of that work , as opposed to the underlying material. Previously registered material.
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 2, 2022
And unlike the vast majority of songwriters and performing artists who have relinquished ownership rights to musical publishers and record labels, Barlow & Bear decided to release “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical” themselves, which means keeping more of the earnings. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. , 1962, 1976 (2014).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Art Law Journal
JUNE 30, 2022
Copyright is the type of Intellectual Property most often associated with artistic works like fine art, movies, or books. Copyright only protects: original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium. For example, anybody can publish a book about three teenagers who solve magical mysteries at a wizarding school.
Art Law Journal
JUNE 30, 2022
Copyright is the type of IP most often associated with artistic works like fine art, movies, or books. Copyright only protects: original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium. More importantly, because the work must be tangible, that also means that an idea can’t be copyrighted , only the execution of that idea.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 4, 2023
Carys Craig, Copyright & Gender: Philosophy, Proof & Praxis Book chapter: research agenda for feminist copyright. Lunney: benefits of © system may also include consumption of © works: attending theater, buying albums, books. Said: ownership records; interview a few repeat players. What goes on in settlement?
43(B)log
AUGUST 3, 2023
The movie adaptation of the book isn’t inherently fair use. Jessica Silbey: same work in different uses will sometimes be fair and sometimes not? They chose not to say the making was not a fair use, hanging on wall, and use in art history book—seem to be conceded fair uses at oral argument. Copyright for humans only?
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The lawsuit potentially raises fundamental issues concerning freedom of speech and the right of journalists to publish sound recordings and transcripts of interviews of public officials, conducted on the record, with the admitted consent of the subject. Third, is Trump’s claim of ownership barred by 17 U.S.C.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
81 
Let's personalize your content