This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. In 2016, Dawgs added new asserted counterclaims against Crocs, including a claim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. See Zenith Elecs. Exzec, Inc. , 3d 1340 (Fed.
27, 2023) Proceedings below most recently blogged here. Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utah’s Unfair Competition Law for falseadvertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those products’ Amazon reviews. Heartwise, Inc., 4th -, 2023 WL 4189604, Nos.
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the sixth edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview. Chapter 9: FalseAdvertising Practice and Remedies. Price: $12. Chapter 4: Deception.
Amazon is an ICS provider: Plaintiff alleges that Defendants “market” and “sell” products to retail consumers “through internet websites.” “Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain falseadvertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink.”
Rebecca Tushnet and I are pleased to announce the seventh edition of our casebook, Advertising & Marketing Law: Cases & Materials. Preface Chapter 1: Overview Chapter 2: What is an Advertisement? Chapter 3: FalseAdvertising Overview Chapter 4: Deception Chapter 5: Which Facts Matter? Price: $12 * Kindle.
8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into falseadvertising cases? Tundra allegedly uses the information it scrapes from Faire’s platform, including contact information, to market its product. This seems wrong; in other cases, including one I just blogged, courts require a link between the falsity and the purchase decision.
The falseadvertising claim fails because Lops didn’t show that the videos “are commercial speech and made for the purpose of influencing consumers to buy YouTube’s goods or services.” YouTube appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Cites to Tiffany v. eBay and Sellify v.
Lanham Act FalseAdvertising. Enigma claimed it was false for Malwarebytes to call its programs “malicious,” “threats,” and PUPs. Malwarebytes , the court held that such labels were subjective opinions, not verifiably false. The legacy of Justice Thomas’ blogging will live on long after the Enigma case is over.
The post Hello, You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About Web Scraping Laws (Guest Blog Post, Part 2 of 2) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Eric’s closing note: for more on that latter point, see my decade-old thinkpiece on online trespass to chattels.].
30, 2024) I don’t usually blog default judgments, but this one was interesting. Plaintiff was required to plead falseadvertising with specificity, then prove it.” This is a falseadvertising case, not a counterfeiting case. Usually, a falseadvertising injunction stops false statements about products.
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. Apple appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. eBay case from 2008.
Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising? HDR appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. (But Facebook’s content wasn’t snarfed, and the mods may not care as much as other users).
This is yet another blog post about 50 Cent a/k/a Curtis Jackson. If the clinic is falsely claiming that he is, that’s falseadvertising and possibly defamation. Kogan appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Doing what, exactly? The opinion doesn’t say. ” Ha! The complaint.
And then…the Ninth Circuit got the case again… The Majority Opinion After the Supreme Court cert denial, the district court ruled that Malwarebytes’ “malicious” and “threat” classifications were “non-actionable statements of opinion” and thus could not support a Lanham Act falseadvertising claim.
He then sued the court document repository websites (and other defendants) for defamation, falseadvertising, and more. Microsoft appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. In 2020, Medina got the disclosures from the 2014 case sealed. The trial court anti-SLAPPED that lawsuit. The appeals court affirms.
After remand, the case went back to the Ninth Circuit, which held that anti-threat classifications might be Lanham Act falseadvertising. Today I’m blogging the district court decision after that remand. Bleeping Computer , where the court found that self-laudatory blog posts were ads. The result is ugly.
20, 2022) Plaintiff PCC sued NABP, a nonprofit whose membership consists of state/similar political unit boards of pharmacy (some other pharmacy associations/partnerships are also separate defendants), alleging violations of the Sherman Act and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. pharmacies.”
A couple of specifics: The falseadvertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falselyadvertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” Despite Doe v. The complaint.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The account formation process included a screen where a user could proceed only by clicking on the “play” button: Warner Bros. sought to send the case to arbitration.
He paid money to get extra visibility for his dating profile and claims he got poor results, so he sued Bumble for falseadvertising. Bumble appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Alkutkar used the dating app Bumble. Bumble successfully redirects the case to arbitration based on its TOS. Bumble, Inc.
Nike claims that StockX has been leveraging the brands reputation to market and sell their unauthorised NFTs at inflated prices, misleading consumers into believing that the NFTs are official or authorised by Nike. Since filing the case, Nike has expanded the charges filed to include claims of counterfeiting and falseadvertising.
The non-fungible part means that it is something that has unique value based on the buyer’s sentiment and/or market dynamics. In practice, what this means is that a whole new market has been opened-up as NFTs have provided a system that has enabled the sale of digital items by transforming them into collectables, such as a tweet.
.” With respect to policy, the majority goes property-absolutist: “Because state property rights can facilitate market exchange, interpreting the § 230(e)(2) limitation to include state intellectual property laws tracks Congress’s pro-free-market goal.” I even agree with the latter point!) Facebook , Nos.
Vogue’s publishers have sued rappers Drake and 21 Savage for unauthorized use of Vogue’s trademarks and false representations in marketing their newest album, “Her Loss”. This follows Vogue’s controversial lawsuit asking a small English pub called “The Star Inn at Vogue” to change its name.
If they really wanted to build their business, they could have invested that money into marketing instead of legal fees. Consistent with that, Aliign is spending more marketing dollars to appeal this lawsuit to the Ninth Circuit. lululemon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Reyes & Adler v.
One of Elysium’s counterclaims was based on statements that appeared on a blog, Right of Assembly, upwards of 20 times: ChromaDex isn’t allowed to say that NR treats any disease, because the FDA has not approved that. Was this commercial advertising or promotion? It was also first to market.) You can find out more here: [link].
1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the falseadvertising claims with prejudice.
This blog intends to explore this fine line as well as means to navigate this issue at hand to properly protect and encourage environmentalism and prevent these business giants from misusing trademarks to foster consumer trust. The objective is to mislead the consumers knowing well the marketability of this concept.
18, 2022) Previous discussion (one of four opinions in the case that I blogged). The district court remitted the falseadvertising damage award from over $8,000,000 to under $85,000 to reflect that it wasn’t sure whether Utah residents (the ones surveyed) had the same definition of “local” as others.
It alleged that defendants unlawfully conspired to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Act and that NABP engaged in falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act. Lanham Act claims against NABP: “NABP’s website claims that sites on its Not Recommended List are unsafe and illegal, including Plaintiff’s website and blog.”
.” That wasn’t the case here: “Google did nothing to make the content of the advertisement itself more unlawful.” ” The court summarizes: “it is plain that Section 230 protects Google from liability in the negligence and falseadvertising action brought by Mr. Ynfante.”
Netaifm alleged that defendants engaged in anticompetitive market behavior when the Jain entities acquired majority shares of two local design firms, which connect manufacturers to growers, and alleged falseadvertising. 2021) The parties compete in the micro-irrigation industry, which targets agricultural growers.
and other unfair acts such as misappropriation of trade secrets, falseadvertising, breach of contract, and antitrust violations. Many IP owners are facing more competition from infringing imported products and are looking ways to maintain and grow their position in the market. In comparison to litigating in U.S.
A click fraud case against a competitor: Motogolf fails to state a falseadvertising claim under the Lanham Act. First, Motogolf does not plausibly allege that the defendants’ clicking activity constitutes commercial advertising. Motogolf.com, LLC v. Top Shelf Golf, LLC, 2022 WL 834790 (D. March 21, 2022).
It brought Lanham Act and California FAL/UCL claims over defendants’ allegedly falseadvertising of their respective OTC lidocaine patches. Scilex isn’t required to show that the ads were the only reason for reduced sales, so arguments about the crowded market weren’t helpful at this stage. back and spinal pain). Matkari, 7 F.3d
Well, the FTC thinks this is “review hijacking,” when a marketer “steals or repurposes reviews of another product.” ” An FTC blog described this case as “ Mutiny on the Bountiful.” Let’s be clear – this was not necessarily “plain old falseadvertising.”
24, 2022) Plaintiffs (Mito Red) sell red-light therapy products online, in competition with Platinum (which uses the Volkin defendants’ marketing services). Among other things, Mito Red alleged that blog posts/video such as “Mito Red Light Therapy Scam: What Are They Lying About?” Mito Red here is the follower” was puffery.
29, 2021) Plaintiffs alleged that Kodiak was liable for “(1) non-functional slack fill and (2) deceptive marketing practices” for its pancake and waffle mixes. Defendant misleadingly labels and advertises its products as having “no preservatives” as well as being “free of artificial additives,” “non-GMO,” “healthy,” and “protein-packed.”
So by the time the court says “the parties are vying for users in the same ‘market,'” you know that the judge has lost the thread. How can Troia vie for a “market” when the court already said he “is not offering a good or service”??? .” So why wasn’t that dispositive?
[Note: this blog post covers Rep. The manufacturer can sue the seller for copying its shots; the manufacturer can sue for falseadvertising if non-official shots aren’t “accurate,” and freelancers love to sue over product shots they took and ones they think are too similar to the ones they took.].
We usually get ours at the local farmers market.] ” More Posts About Keyword Advertising * Internal Search Results Aren’t Trademark Infringing–PEM v. Bye, Goff * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet
Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. In my blog post on the prior opinion, I mentioned four possibilities: allege anti-competitive animus (rephrased in the amended opinion as “anti-competitive conduct”). Google, Inc. ,
I have a long-standing personal policy not to give my consumer dollars to any entity that I mock on the blog for IP overreaches. McNeil. * Three Keyword Advertising Decisions in a Week, and the Trademark Owners Lost Them All. * Competitor Gets Pyrrhic Victory in FalseAdvertising Suit Over Search Ads–Harbor Breeze v.
As I teach my students, Porta-Fab should have spent its enforcement budget on more marketing instead of more lawyers, which almost certainly would produce a higher ROI than this lawsuit did. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute FalseAdvertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet 2022 WL 4596646 (C.D.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content