This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).
The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to falseadvertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” As my blog coverage makes clear, I am not a fan of those opinions). Last week I blogged M.S. Google opinion.
Lanham Act FalseAdvertising. Enigma claimed it was false for Malwarebytes to call its programs “malicious,” “threats,” and PUPs. Malwarebytes , the court held that such labels were subjective opinions, not verifiably false. The legacy of Justice Thomas’ blogging will live on long after the Enigma case is over.
The post Hello, You’ve Been Referred Here Because You’re Wrong About Web Scraping Laws (Guest Blog Post, Part 2 of 2) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Eric’s closing note: for more on that latter point, see my decade-old thinkpiece on online trespass to chattels.].
13, 2023) I don’t usually blog default cases because there’s usually little legal analysis; this case is an exception around the fraught area of first sale, showing unusual diligence by the court. Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. BRYK Enters., LLC, 2023 WL 2933464, No. 22-cv-658-jdp (W.D. Even after default.
The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). FalseAdvertising. Apple appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. ” Section 230. eBay case from 2008.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. The design elements use “a contrasting font color” making the notice legible on the dark background. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. sought to send the case to arbitration. The district court disagreed.
After remand, the case went back to the Ninth Circuit, which held that anti-threat classifications might be Lanham Act falseadvertising. Today I’m blogging the district court decision after that remand. That putatively means that the court would characterize all threat identifications as “advertising.”
Despite the rhetorical moves to position the lawsuit about the defendants’ design choices, this is actually an easy case. Snap appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. .” Both apps allegedly were not responsive enough to complaints or unmasking requests, including not following their own purported policies.
JC Penny, for example, has been hit with a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of California over its alleged advertising practice of using “false reference pricing.” Carranza claims that JC Penny falselyadvertises its products on its e-commerce website by listing a high reference price and the corresponding sale price.
1, 2024) NYU Langone sued Northwell for trade dress infringement, unfair competition and falsedesignation of origin, and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act, as well as related claims under the New York GBL and New York common law. The court dismissed the complaint—the falseadvertising claims with prejudice.
18, 2022) Previous discussion (one of four opinions in the case that I blogged). The district court remitted the falseadvertising damage award from over $8,000,000 to under $85,000 to reflect that it wasn’t sure whether Utah residents (the ones surveyed) had the same definition of “local” as others.
sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, falsedesignation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. In addition to the previous causes of action, Nike has asked the court to add counterfeiting and falseadvertising claims against StockX. On February 3 rd 2022 Nike Inc.
One of Elysium’s counterclaims was based on statements that appeared on a blog, Right of Assembly, upwards of 20 times: ChromaDex isn’t allowed to say that NR treats any disease, because the FDA has not approved that. However, Elysium didn’t show that all the pages of the blog had a Tru Niagen banner, only the homepage. [I
Netaifm alleged that defendants engaged in anticompetitive market behavior when the Jain entities acquired majority shares of two local design firms, which connect manufacturers to growers, and alleged falseadvertising. Jain is Netafim’s largest competitor. Jain had approximately $25 million in Central Valley sales in 2016.
In fall 2023, Overjet launched its “Anatomical Structures Visualization Tool” for Overjet Caries Assist, which introduced the relevant coloring scheme and design. It also allegedly “selected the design and colors to help with brand identification; the purple, for example, complements Overjet’s purple brand color.” Overjet, Inc.
” I agree 100%, and this line seems relevant to the court challenges to the age-appropriate design codes as applied to UGC publishers (and many other pending attempts to work around Section 230). ” That wasn’t the case here: “Google did nothing to make the content of the advertisement itself more unlawful.”
While this may sound a little wacky, it makes sense that Section 230 was designed to ensure that Internet services only need to comply with a single national standard as much as possible. Facebook appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. In 2007, the Ninth Circuit in Perfect 10 v.
20, 2022) Plaintiff PCC sued NABP, a nonprofit whose membership consists of state/similar political unit boards of pharmacy (some other pharmacy associations/partnerships are also separate defendants), alleging violations of the Sherman Act and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act. pharmacies.”
Platinum allegedly hired the Volkin defendants to “engage in a strategic defamation campaign online designed to ruin Plaintiffs’ professional reputation and to divert Plaintiffs’ customers away from their products and to Platinum’s competitive products.” The statement that “Leaders come first and then all the followers.
.” The agency stated in a press release that “boosting your products by hijacking another product’s ratings or reviews is a relatively new tactic, but is still plain old falseadvertising.” ” An FTC blog described this case as “ Mutiny on the Bountiful.” Let’s unpack this.
Similar guarantees remain on Young Living’s “various blogs and other websites.” Young Living continued to advertise the products as being “therapeutic-grade.” Yet, if the company falselyadvertised that you could ‘blow a bubble bigger than your own head,’ it is plausible that a reasonable buyer could be misled.”
” I’ll focus on the falsedesignation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. ” Following mid-2000s cases like Lamparello and Lucas Nursery , we rarely see such unforgiving anti-griper opinions that twist the Lanham Act to cover circumstances it was never designed to cover. Reyes & Adler v.
[Note: this blog post covers Rep. It claims to focus on “counterfeits” that could harm consumer “health and safety,” but those are both lies designed to make the bill seem narrower and more balanced than it actually is. However, this bill is itself a giant counterfeit. A new frontier for a trade war.].
It’s not hard to imagine how a negligent design claim could have been structured here. First, the plaintiff could have argued that YouTube’s design encourages the production and viewing of illegal animal abuse videos. YouTube appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Case citation : Freethinker v.
” The falsedesignation of origin claim is similarly governed by the Ninth Circuit’s Lasoff v. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Groupon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. With respect to the trademark claim, the court says the Ninth Circuit’s Multi-Time Machine v. Amazon ruling.
The ads “are designed to display generic terms that consumers might associate with any personal injury firm.” McNeil. * Three Keyword Advertising Decisions in a Week, and the Trademark Owners Lost Them All. * Competitor Gets Pyrrhic Victory in FalseAdvertising Suit Over Search Ads–Harbor Breeze v.
The slew of amicus and other briefs had been filed, and it was time to “get crackin’ on” this blog post, as in time to get moving on the drafting. Did the effort at architectural minimalism “[k]eep the design simple, [and] remove the gratuitous or unwanted details” ? ” Id. In VIP Products v.
The trademark owner sued the advertiser for trademark infringement and lost in the district court. Prior blog post on the district court ruling. These states have created a mutant species of IP law disconnected from both trademark law or falseadvertising law; and this mutant IP comes from an unelected group, not a legislature.
The Court noted that the Patents Act is specifically designed to deal with matters concerning allegations of unreasonable conditions in licence agreements, abuse of one’s status as a patentee, the necessary inquiry into these allegations, and eventually the relief that can be granted. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai.
Or, at the most, confuse Defendant’s app with Plaintiffs’ This situation is different from the websites in Network Automation and Playboy, which were clearly distinguished with ad designations. Luxy appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The search results here do not have those same disclaimers.
This post is all about you…readers of the blog! My blog post usually aren’t meant to be accessible to beginners. As a result, since nearly the blog’s beginning, I’ve done little to cater to beginners. I’m very grateful for your blog!” I always learn something new.”
The challenged claims were made in a trade magazine for the petroleum industry; on a blog post on Graces website; and, sometimes with greater elaboration, in direct outreach to certain customers. Grace cited Ony, Inc. Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc. , 3d 490 (2d Cir. But GWAs own claim for patent infringement complicates the matter.
The blog covers how trademarks evolve in the era of social media and influencer marketing, analyzing legal uncertainties, protection mechanisms, and best practices for commercial usage. This can place a brand at risk or give rise to claims of falseadvertising against it.
Amazons sale of a product, without more, does not warrant treating Amazon as the maker of the statements contained within that products commercial advertising.” I’m not sure all of the “negligent design” opinions actually respect that legal standard. UPDATE: Prof.
The Trump administration and its appointees have promised a wide range of new speech-busting censorship regulations that are designed to reduce government accountability and subtract power from American citizens. 6, 2024) Some Related Posts on Efforts to Ban TikTok * Court Revives Indiana AGs FalseAdvertising Case Against TikTokState v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content